Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2010 Nov 30;65(4):920–926. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22704

Table 1.

Fitted results for three types of cells. All fitted parameters are statistically different from each other (p<0.05 by Wilcoxon rank-sum test), except the cell sizes of type I and II fitted by Eq. [2].

microscopya Fitted by Eq.[2]b Fitted by Eq.[3]b

diameter [µm] diameter [µm] Din [µm2/ms] S/V [µm−1] D0 [µm2/ms]

type I 10.22±2.44 11.14±0.64 1.14±0.02 1.23±0.09 1.29±0.02
type II 10.28±2.09 11.33±0.76 1.09±0.02 1.11±0.13 1.21±0.03
type III 9.20±1.92 10.21±0.47 1.03±0.03 1.36±0.15 1.16±0.04
a

mean±SD of over 250 cells

b

mean±SD of all six samples in each cell type.