Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 6;2(8):1889–1902. doi: 10.1002/ece3.307

Table 2.

ACE-2 PCR species composition and relative distribution per locality/island of each genetic cluster revealed by STRUCTURE

ACE-2 Localities


Madeira Cape Verde


N P H Q PM RB SC SA B F S M
Cluster 1 190 190 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 66 (34.7) 39 (20.5) 34 (17.8) 51 (26.8) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Cluster 2 25 9 (36.0) 16 (64.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 25 (100.0)
Cluster 3 39 1 (2.6) 34 (87.2) 4 (10.2) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 14 (35.9) 0 (0.0) 25 (64.1)
Cluster 4 91 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 91 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 31 (34.1) 7 (7.7) 53 (58.2) 0 (0.0)
Admixed 29 3 (10.3) 6 (20.7) 20 (69.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 15 (51.6) 1 (3.4) 13 (44.8)

N, number of individuals; P, Culex pipiens by ACE-2 identification; Q, Culex quinquefasciatus by ACE-2 identification; H, hybrids between Culex pipiens and Culex quinquefasciatus by ACE-2 identification; PM, Porto Moniz; RB, Ribeira Brava; SC, Santa Cruz; SA, Santana; B, Brava island; F, Fogo island; S, Santiago island; M, Maio island.

Values in parenthesis refer to the frequencies (in percentage) within each cluster.