Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 6;2(8):1889–1902. doi: 10.1002/ece3.307

Table 3.

Frequencies purebred and hybrid individuals detected by NEWHYBRIDS in each of the ancestry clusters revealed by STRUCTURE

NEWHYBRIDS

H

N P Q H F1 F2 BxP BxQ H′
Cluster 1 190 189 (99.4) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.6)
Cluster 2 25 24 (96.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (4.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (4.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Cluster 3 39 4 (10.3) 1 (2.6) 34 (87.1) 0 (0.0) 10 (25.6) 9 (23.1) 0 (0.0) 15 (38.4)
Cluster 4 91 0 (0.0) 91 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Admixed 29 3 (10.4) 13 (44.8) 13 (44.8) 0 (0.0) 8 (27.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 5 (17.2)

N, number of individuals; P, pure Culex pipiens; Q, pure Culex quinquefasciatus; H, hybrids between the pure groups (Culex pipiens and Culex quinquefasciatus); F1, hybrid first generation; F2, hybrids second generation; BxP, backcross Culex pipiens; BxQ, backcross Culex quinquefasciatus, H′, hybrids defined by the sum of assignment probabilities for all hybrid classes.

Values in parenthesis refer to the frequencies (in percentage) within each cluster.