Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 May 31;44(1):103–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.04.004

Table 4.

Interaction odds ratios (abstinence) and incidence rate ratios (days of use) with primary outcome of stimulant substance use within a 30-day window of assessment.

Logistic Portion of Model (Abstinence vs. Non- Abstinence) Model-based average predicted probabilities of abstinence for stimulant substance use within each 30-day window
Assessment Time Points Odds Ratio 95% CI for Odds Ratio TAU STAGE-12 Total
Mid-Treatment (30-day) 3.34** 1.20, 9.28 0.57 0.71 0.64
End-of-Treatment (60-day) 2.44* 1.01, 5.86 0.61 0.72 0.66
1st Follow-up (90-day) 1.78 0.81, 3.90 0.66 0.72 0.69
2nd Follow-up (120-day) 1.30 0.60, 2.79 0.70 0.72 0.71
3rd Follow-up (150-day) 0.95 0.42, 2.15 0.73 0.73 0.73
Last Follow-up (180-day) 0.69 0.27, 1.77 0.77 0.73 0.75
Negative Binomial Portion of Model (Count of Non-zero Use) Model-based average predicted values of number of days of stimulant substance use within each 30-day window
Assessment Time Points Rate Ratio 95% CI for Rate Ratio TAU STAGE-12 Total
Mid-Treatment (30-day) 1.66* 1.05, 2.60 1.08 1.19 1.13
End-of-Treatment (60-day) 1.50* 1.01, 2.24 1.28 1.34 1.31
1st Follow-up (90-day) 1.36 0.93, 1.98 1.51 1.50 1.51
2nd Follow-up (120-day) 1.23 0.84, 1.79 1.77 1.69 1.73
3rd Follow-up (150-day) 1.11 0.74, 1.66 2.05 1. 90 1.98
Last Follow-up (180-day) 1.00 0.64, 1.57 2.35 2.13 2.25
*

p<.05;

**

p<.025