Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 6;3:173. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00173

Table 5.

Difference in power of each method between models D and A and models F and E.

Region Models DMAF sq rare DMAF abs rare DMAF abs all C-alpha rare C-alpha all Hotel CMC aSum KBAC RVT1 Price WSS
1 D–A 0.04 0.06 −0.09 0.01 −0.24 0.09 0.09 −0.76 −0.23 −0.73 −0.63 −0.43
1 F–E 0.55 0.42 0.18 0.61 −0.25 0.35 0.44 −0.09 0.32 −0.05 −0.1 0.2
2 D–A −0.02 −0.11 −0.04 0 0.06 0.02 −0.07 −0.9 −0.28 −0.87 −0.86 −0.68
2 F–E 0.03 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.02 0.1 0.04 −0.91 −0.15 −0.91 −0.89 −0.58
3 D–A 0.13 0.31 0.25 0.11 0.28 0.18 0.15 −0.81 −0.29 −0.8 −0.85 −0.41
3 F–E 0.12 0.35 0.18 0.12 −0.04 0.17 0.08 −0.56 −0.18 −0.59 −0.62 −0.44

Positive values (bold) indicate increased power when protective variants are added to the simulations.