Table 4.

G–P matrices comparisons between asexual and sexual lineages of R. padi using the Flury hierarchy and the MANOVA methods. The verdict of the Flury hierarchy is the model that best explains the difference between two matrices. The probabilities given for the Flury hierarchy correspond to the test of equality of two matrices, not necessarily to the verdict. The method MANOVA refers to the results obtained by using the scores of the pseudovalues of the G and P matrices. The numbers in parentheses for the MANOVA method correspond to the freedom degree associated to respective test

	Flury Hierarchy			MANOVA Jackknife
	LRT	P-value	Verdict	λ (Wills)	F-value	P-value
G matrix
Asexual–sexual	3.116	<0.05	PCPC 2	0.045	17.06(21,17)	<0.001
P matrix
Asexual–sexual	5.647	0.80	Equal	0.905	1.27(21,255)	0.19