Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul;2(7):1458–1467. doi: 10.1002/ece3.268

Table 3.

Statistical comparisons between the average haplotype ratios and frequencies from data listed in Table 2. Standard deviations are in parentheses

Average frequency

Group h4/h2 CS-h1 CS-h2 CS-h3 CS-h4 [G/A]1164
Total 1.4 (1.9) 0.10 (0.05) 0.53 (0.22) 0.01 (0.01) 0.36 (0.24) 1.0 (1.2)
TX group (TX) 0.3 (0.1) 0.12 (0.05) 0.69 (0.10) 0.01 (0.01) 0.18 (0.08) 0.3 (0.1)
FL group (FL) 3.1 (2.2) 0.07 (0.05) 0.27 (0.10) 0.01 (0.01) 0.65 (0.11) 2.3 (1.3)
Intermediate (Int) 0.9 (0.1) 0.08 (0.04) 0.48 (0.05) 0.00 (0.01) 0.43 (0.04) 0.8 (0.1)
TX[O] 0.2 (0.2) 0.09 (0.05) 0.77 (0.13) 0.01 (0.01) 0.15 (0.11) 0.2 (0.2)
TX[M] 0.3 (0.1) 0.13 (0.05) 0.67 (0.08) 0.01 (0.01) 0.19 (0.07) 0.3 (0.1)
FL[O] 5.2 (3.1) 0.07 (0.06) 0.18 (0.09) 0.01 (0.01) 0.74 (0.09) 3.4 (1.6)
FL[M] 2.4 (1.3) 0.07 (0.05) 0.30 (0.08) 0.01 (0.02) 0.62 (0.10) 1.9 (0.9)
Two-tailed P-value

Comparisons h4/h2 CS-h1 CS-h2 CS-h3 CS-h4 [G/A]1164
TX versus FL P < 0.0001 P = 0.006 P < 0.0001 P = 0.11 P < 0.0001 P < 0.0001
TX versus Int P = 0.0001 P = 0.18 P = 0.0002 P = 0.56 P = 0.0001 P = 0.0001
FL versus Int P = 0.0005 P = 0.69 P = 0.0005 P = 0.51 P = 0.0005 P = 0.0005
TX[O] versus TX[M] P = 0.37 P = 0.06 P = 0.24 P = 0.92 P = 0.39 P = 0.40
FL[O] versus FL[M] P = 0.06 P = 0.90 P = 0.02 P = 0.95 P = 0.06 P = 0.06