Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 6.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Health. 2012 Sep;9(4):314–322. doi: 10.1071/SH11067

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Model of hypothesised relationships among perceived subordination, sexual communication self-efficacy and actual sexual communication.

Note: All items’ scores of sexual communication self-efficacy were reversed. Q indicates an item with corresponding question number. lg_Q denotes a base-10 logarithm transformation of the reversed score due to the score’s slightly non-normal distribution. r_S stands for residual; e stands for error terms.