Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 6;7(9):e43790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043790

Table 5. Variability in Quantiferon-TB Gold in-Tube test measurements performed on the same subjects in three labs excluding those with extremely high TB Response.

LOA*
Measure Comparison n Bias* ± (SDD*) W-S SD* (95%CI) ICC (95% CI) W-S CV% (95% CI)
Nil
Lab1 vs. Lab2
Unstratified§ 91 0.01±(0.11) ±0.04 (0.03, 0.04) 0.89 (0.84, 0.93) 33.63 (29.38, 37.40)
Concordant Positive# 35 0.00±(0.12) ±0.04 (0.04, 0.06) 0.94 (0.89, 0.97) 35.11 (28.53, 40.63)
Concordant Negative 49 0.01±(0.10) ±0.04 (0.03, 0.05) 0.22 (−0.06, 0.47) 33.56 (27.08, 38.98)
Lab1 vs. Lab3
Unstratified§ 91 −0.01±(0.16) ±0.06 (0.05, 0.07) 0.72 (0.61, 0.81) 40.83 (35.50, 45.54)
Concordant Positive# 35 −0.01±(0.17) ±0.06 (0.05, 0.08) 0.86 (0.74, 0.93) 40.47 (30.89, 48.18)
Concordant Negative 49 −0.02±(0.16) ±0.06 (0.05, 0.07) 0.13 (−0.15, 0.39) 41.91 (34.54, 48.16)
Lab2 vs. Lab3
Unstratified§ 91 −0.02±(0.19) ±0.07 (0.06, 0.08) 0.64 (0.50, 0.75) 44.78 (38.78, 50.06)
Concordant Positive# 35 −0.01±(0.22) ±0.08 (0.06, 0.10) 0.78 (0.61, 0.88) 44.11 (36.00, 50.93)
Concordant Negative 49 −0.02±(0.17) ±0.06 (0.05, 0.08) −0.14 (−0.40, 0.14) 46.54 (37.31, 54.21)
TB
Lab1 vs. Lab2
Unstratified§ 91 0.19±(2.98) ±1.08 (0.94, 1.26) 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) 28.23 (22.40, 33.05)
Concordant Positive# 35 0.48±(4.79) ±1.73 (1.40, 2.27) 0.96 (0.92, 0.98) 23.14 (16.98, 27.97)
Concordant Negative 49 0.00±(0.09) ±0.03 (0.03, 0.04) 0.69 (0.51, 0.81) 26.07 (20.30, 30.77)
Lab1 vs. Lab3
Unstratified§ 91 0.67±(6.18) ±2.23 (1.95, 2.61) 0.84 (0.77, 0.89) 37.43 (32.06, 42.12)
Concordant Positive# 35 1.81±(9.62) ±3.47 (2.81, 4.55) 0.76 (0.58, 0.87) 31.32 (25.36, 36.32)
Concordant Negative 49 −0.04±(0.19) ±0.07 (0.06, 0.09) 0.39 (0.13, 0.60) 39.89 (31.87, 46.55)
Lab2 vs. Lab3
Unstratified§ 91 0.48±(4.28) ±1.54 (1.35, 1.81) 0.91 (0.87, 0.94) 35.37 (29.77, 40.19)
Concordant Positive# 35 1.33±(6.61) ±2.38 (1.93, 3.12) 0.85 (0.73, 0.92) 26.99 (19.91, 32.57)
Concordant Negative 49 −0.05±(0.20) ±0.07 (0.06, 0.09) 0.32 (0.05, 0.55) 40.57 (32.31, 47.42)
TB Response
Lab1 vs. Lab2
Unstratified§ 91 0.19±(2.97) ±1.07 (0.94, 1.26) 0.97 (0.96, 0.98) 43.91 (36.95, 49.91)
Concordant Positive# 35 0.48±(4.77) ±1.72 (1.39, 2.26) 0.96 (0.92, 0.98) 42.04 (33.20, 49.32)
Concordant Negative 49 0.00±(0.08) ±0.03 (0.03, 0.04) 0.70 (0.53–0.82) 42.49 (33.84, 49.66)
Lab1 vs. Lab3
Unstratified§ 91 0.68±(6.17) ±2.23 (1.94, 2.61) 0.84 (0.77, 0.89) 55.39 (47.83, 62.03)
Concordant Positive# 35 1.82±(9.61) ±3.47 (2.80, 4.54) 0.76 (0.58, 0.87) 51.17 (39.96, 60.33)
Concordant Negative 49 −0.03±(0.11) ±0.04 (0.03, 0.05) 0.56 (0.34, 0.72) 57.86 (47.00, 66.98)
Lab2 vs. Lab3
Unstratified§ 91 0.50±(4.29) ±1.55 (1.35, 1.81) 0.91 (0.87, 0.94) 57.06 (48.89, 64.20)
Concordant Positive# 35 1.35±(6.64) ±2.40 (1.94, 3.14) 0.85 (0.73, 0.92) 51.71 (41.14, 60.46)
Concordant Negative 49 −0.03±(0.11) ±0.04 (0.03, 0.05) 0.63 (0.43, 0.77) 61.74 (49.35, 72.03)
*

LOA, bias, SDD, and W-S SD are in IU/mL of IFN-γ.

Directionality for bias and LOA comparisons: Lab1-Lab2, Lab1-Lab3, Lab2-Lab3.

§

Includes 7 subjects with discordant QFT-GIT interpretations.

#

Concordant positive among results from all 3 labs.

Concordant negative among results from all 3 labs.