Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2011 Oct 21;118(12):3135–3144. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26630

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Baseline and follow-up [18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography/computed tomography images are shown of 2 patients with angiosarcoma of the breast. The patient shown in (A) exhibited >95% tissue necrosis after neoadjuvant treatment and was classified as a histopathologic responder. The patient in (B) was a histopathologic nonresponder with <5% tissue necrosis after treatment. However, comparable decreases in fluorothymidine uptake of 85% and 71%, respectively, were seen. Therefore, the patient in (B) was misclassified as a metabolic responder by fluorothymidine positron emission tomography analysis. SUVpeak indicates peak standardized uptake value.