Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Bull. 2012 May 28;139(1):81–132. doi: 10.1037/a0028727

Table 4.

Simultaneous Moderator Regression Analyses

DV IV Beta 95% Confidence Interval
B SE p K N QB(df) QW(df)
Lower Limit Upper Limit
Inhibition:
Stroop Interference Severity 0.20 -0.47 0.86 0.057 0.098 .6 17 1482 0.70 (3) 12.2 (13)
Age 0.12 -0.58 0.82 0.003 0.008 .7
Medication 0.18 -0.44 0.81 0.001 0.002 .6

Inhibition Comp. Severity 0.32 0.01 0.64 0.100 0.050 .045* 43 3260 6.11 (3) 38.69 (39)
Age 0.08 -0.22 0.37 0.002 0.004 .6
Medication 0.32 0.01 0.64 0.003 0.002 .046*
Shifting:
WCST Severity 0.40 -0.03 0.83 0.156 0.086 .069# 23 1943 3.36 (3) 20.91 (19)
Age -0.01 -0.41 0.39 0.000 0.005 .9
Medication 0.18 -0.25 0.62 0.002 0.002 .4
TMT-B Severity 0.27 -0.10 0.63 0.100 0.069 .2 27 2787 8.69 (3) 23.46 (23)
Age 0.33 -0.02 0.68 0.010 0.005 .066#

TMT-A (Comparison Condition) Medication 0.36 0.00 0.72 0.004 0.002 .048*
Severity 0.09 -0.36 0.54 0.030 0.076 .7 22 2756 1.69 (3) 18.80 (18)
Age 0.02 -0.42 0.46 0.001 0.007 .9
Medication 0.29 -0.15 0.74 0.003 0.002 .2
Shifting Comp. Severity 0.29 0.04 0.55 0.089 0.040 .025* 55 5116 6.71 (3) 54.44 (51)
Age 0.11 -0.14 0.36 0.003 0.003 .4
Medication 0.18 -0.08 0.43 0.001 0.001 .2
Verbal Working Memory:
Forward Digit Span Severity -0.01 -0.43 0.41 -0.003 0.063 .9 22 1782 5.34 (3) 17.33 (18)
Age -0.06 -0.48 0.36 -0.002 0.006 .8
Medication 0.49 0.07 0.91 0.004 0.002 .022*
Backward Digit Span Severity 0.43 -0.00 0.87 0.155 0.079 .051# 17 1662 7.63 (3) 14.42 (13)
Age -0.29 -0.76 0.17 -0.011 0.009 .2
Medication 0.40 -0.06 0.86 0.004 0.003 .086#
Maintenance Comp. Severity 0.14 -0.23 0.51 0.038 0.052 .5 26 2055 7.85 (3) 21.37 (22)
Age 0.14 -0.23 0.51 0.003 0.004 .5
Medication 0.53 0.16 0.90 0.004 0.001 .005*
Manipulation Comp. Severity 0.43 0.04 0.82 0.136 0.063 .031* 20 2080 9.04 (3) 17.27 (16)
Age -0.11 -0.50 0.28 -0.003 0.005 .6
Medication 0.29 -0.10 0.68 0.003 0.002 .139
Verbal WM Comp.a Severity 0.32 0.00 0.63 0.080 0.041 .049* 30 2840 17.05 (4) 24.93 (25)
Age 0.02 -0.29 0.34 0.000 0.003 .9
Medication 0.55 0.21 0.89 0.004 0.001 .001*
Task 0.10 -0.23 0.43 0.043 0.074 .6

Visuospatial Working Memory:
Visuospatial WM Comp. Severity 0.30 -0.15 0.75 0.095 0.073 .2 17 1455 7.64 (3) 12.41 (13)
Age -0.03 -0.49 0.43 -0.001 0.006 .9
Medication 0.50 0.04 0.96 0.005 0.002 .035*

Verbal Fluency:
Semantic VF Severity 0.72 0.32 1.12 0.408 0.116 <.001* 17 1643 13.97 (3) 13.95 (15)
Age 0.00 -0.40 0.39 0.000 0.007 .9
Medication 0.22 -0.16 0.60 0.003 0.003 .3
Phonemic VF Severity 0.66 0.28 1.03 0.194 0.057 .001* 29 2850 11.85 (3) 24.79 (25)
Age 0.16 -0.19 0.50 0.003 0.004 .4
Medication 0.32 -0.04 0.67 0.002 0.001 .085#
VF Comp.b Severity 0.58 0.24 0.91 0.203 0.060 .001* 34 3466 15.61 (3) 29.73(29)
Age 0.07 -0.23 0.37 0.002 0.004 .7
Medication 0.28 -0.05 0.62 0.003 0.002 .099#
Task 0.13 -0.19 0.44 0.073 0.094 .4

Comparison Measures:
Psychomotor Speed Comp. Severity 0.48 0.03 0.92 0.209 0.101 .038* 18 1743 7.21 (3) 13.61 (14)
Age 0.44 -0.02 0.90 0.013 0.007 .060#
Medication 0.17 -0.28 0.62 0.002 0.003 .5
Digit-Symbol Substitution Severity 0.32 -0.17 0.80 0.171 0.134 .2 18 1944 9.84 (3) 14.65 (14)
Age 0.28 -0.20 0.75 0.011 0.010 .3
Medication 0.40 -0.01 0.82 0.006 0.003 .056#
Vocabulary Severity 0.45 0.13 0.76 0.098 0.035 .006* 30 2175 19.18 (3) 23.25 (26)
Age 0.55 0.22 0.88 0.013 0.004 .001*
Medication -0.20 -0.54 0.15 -0.001 0.001 .3

Note. Comp. = composite score; WCST= Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; TMT-B = Trail Making Test part B; TMT-A = Trail Making Test part A; WM = working memory; VF = verbal fluency; IV = independent variable; DV = dependent variable; d = weighted mean effect size; K = number of studies; N = number of participants; Qw = residual heterogeneity; QB= heterogeneity accounted for by moderators.

a

Analysis controlling for task (maintenance, manipulation or both), because of significant differences between verbal working memory maintenance and manipulation effect sizes.

b

Analysis controlling for task (semantic, phonemic or both), because of significant differences between semantic and phonemic effect sizes.

*

Significant (p<.05).

#

Marginal (p<.10).