Table 2.

Models of psychosocial predictors on condom and gel use consistency, and on general interest in gel use, by cohort (each psychosocial variable fit separately)

Psychosocial variable	CT cohort			NCT cohort			CT vs. NCT
	Estimate	Lower CI	Upper CI	Estimate	Lower CI	Upper CI	P value
Models of condom use consistency
Couple harmony	0.13	0.06	0.21	0.11	0.01	0.21	0.73
Partner infidelity	−0.10	−0.15	−0.04	−0.00	−0.06	0.05	0.03
Pervasive HIV risk	−0.13	−0.22	−0.05	0.02	−0.06	0.09	0.01
HIV risk perception (due to own behavior)	0.04	0.00	0.07	0.02	−0.01	0.05	0.50
Protection efficacy	0.30	0.17	0.43	0.02	−0.06	0.11	<0.001
Overall attitudes towards condoms	0.15	0.06	0.24	0.06	−0.03	0.15	0.19
Models of gel use consistency
Couple harmony	−0.06	−0.23	0.12
Partner infidelity	−0.05	−0.14	0.05
Pervasive HIV risk	−0.06	−0.19	0.07
HIV risk perception (due to own behavior)	0.02	−0.03	0.06
Protection efficacy	0.02	−0.16	0.20
Product attribute (Gel)	0.04	−0.09	0.16
Models of general interest in gel use
Couple harmony	0.15	−0.03	0.34	0.13	−0.11	0.38	0.91
Partner infidelity	−0.06	−0.20	0.08	−0.02	−0.17	0.13	0.70
Pervasive HIV risk	−0.14	−0.35	0.07	−0.01	−0.20	0.18	0.37
HIV risk perception (due to own behavior)	−0.08	−0.16	−0.00	−0.01	−0.09	0.07	0.23
Protection efficacy	0.36	0.07	0.65	0.56	0.36	0.76	0.26
Overall attitudes towards gel	0.11	−0.04	0.25