Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 1;2(5):e001220. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001220

Table 5.

Number of barriers investigated by each study to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews, meta-analyses and the databases containing them

Surveys Number of barriers addressed by each study
Wilson et al (2001) 4: Lack of access, awareness, use and training
Paterson-Brown et al (1995) 2: Lack of access and awareness
Hanson et al (2004) 2: Lack of trust and training
Poolman et al (2007) 2: Lack of understanding, use
Sur et al (2006) 3: Lack of awareness, use and understanding
Dahm et al (2009) 3: Lack of awareness, use and understanding,
McAlister et al (1999) 1: Lack of use
Wilson et al (2001) 1: Lack of access
Ward andYoung (2001) 3: Lack of access, understanding and usefulness
McCaw et al (2007) 1: Lack of use
Kerse et al (2001) 3: Lack of access, awareness and use
McColl et al (1998) 3: Lack of awareness, access and understanding
Bennett et al (2001) 1: Lack of confidence
Young and Ward (1999) 3: Lack of awareness, access and use
Paterson-Brown (1993) 3: Lack of awareness, availability and need
Prescott et al (1999) 2. Lack of use and awareness
Jordan et al (1999) 3: Lack of use, awareness and access
Ciliska et al (1999) 4: Lack of awareness, use, policy climate and resources
Olatunbosun et al (1998) 1: Lack of access
Melnyk et al (2004) 1: Lack of use
Gavgani et al (2008) 2: Lack of use and usefulness
Wilson et al (2003) 4: Lack of access, awareness, use and training
Carey and Hall, (1999) 1: Access
Lawrie et al (2000) 1: Ability to search
Hyde et al (1995) 1: Ability to search
Martis et al (2008) 5: Lack of access, awareness, use, usefulness and training
Qualitative studies  
Dobbins et al (2004) 2: Lack of access and training
Dobbins et al (2007) 4: Lack of relevance, implications, implementation strategies and understanding of the information needs of the target audience
Wilson et al (2001) 7. Limited range, access, focus, use, up-datedness, promotion and time