Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 14;586(17):2732–2739. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.05.008

Table 1.

Functional Enrichment of the 24 most represented accessory domains. Domains were classified as “protein interaction domain” (according to Jin J. et al. [42]), “binding” (according to InterPro) or “other”; p-value was calculated by the DAVID web tool [49], using as input the list of all phosphatases and as background the whole proteome.

Domain type Count p-Value Class Role
Rhodanese-like 14 3,05E-18 PTP Other
NLI interacting factor 7 2,94E-10 HAD Binding
Fibronectin, type III 15 7,47E-04 PTP Protein interaction domain
RPEL repeat 4 1,12E-04 RS Binding
GRAM 5 1,61E-04 PTP Protein interaction domain
U2A’/phosphoprotein 4 6,65E-04 RS Other
FERM 5 9,98E-04 PTP Protein interaction domain
DEK 3 1,32E-03 PTP Protein interaction domain
MAM 4 2,31E-03 PTP Protein interaction domain
SH2 7 4,52E-02 PTP,LP Protein interaction domain
EF-HAND 8 8,74E-02 RS Protein interaction domain
PH 9 PTP Binding
Ig-like 15 PTP Protein interaction domain
C2 9 PTP Protein interaction domain
Arm repeat 8 RS Protein interaction domain
LR repeat 6 RS Protein interaction domain
Ank repeat 5 RS Other
Concavalin A-like 4 PTP Protein interaction domain
WD40 4 RS Protein interaction domain
FHA 3 PTP,HAD,RS Protein interaction domain
HEAT 3 RS Protein interaction domain
Nucleic acid binding 3 PTP,LP Binding
PTB 3 PTP Protein interaction domain