Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 10;3:81. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00081

Table 1.

Mean accuracy scores (SD) for all participants (total), the high WM capacity group (H), and the low WM capacity group (L).

Sham
Anodal
Cathodal
Total H L Total H L Total H L
E1. Sequential Presentation 91 (0.05) 90 (0.04) 91 (0.06) 90 (0.06) 90 (0.05) 90 (0.06) 90 (0.08) 88 (0.07) 92 (0.09)
E1. Change Detection 63 (0.07) 63 (0.08) 64 (0.07) 64 (0.10) 68 (0.08) 60 (0.10) 64 (0.08) 68 (0.08) 61 (0.06)
E2. Set Size 4 82 (0.06) 84 (0.02) 82 (0.01) 83 (0.07) 84 (0.02) 81 (0.02) 81 (0.08) 83 (0.02) 79 (0.02)
E2. Set Size 6 69 (0.06) 70 (0.02) 68 (0.02) 71 (0.06) 73 (0.02) 69 (0.01) 69 (0.07) 70 (0.03) 68 (0.01)
E2. Set Size 8 62 (0.05) 62 (0.02) 62 (0.01) 66 (0.06) 68 (0.01) 64 (0.02) 65 (0.07) 67 (0.01) 63 (0.02)

Rows 1 and 2 represent the tasks from Experiment 1 (E1) and rows 3–5 represent the set sizes in Experiment 2 (E2).