Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug;43(4):367–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02273.x

Table 5.

Comparison of results from this study to previously published feed efficiency QTL studies. Concordance was established if a forward-selected SNP was within ±0.5 Mb of a previously published QTL position

Trait SNP ID Chr Position (Mb)1 Validation position (Mb)2
AFI ss86278343 11 5.660631 5.2053923
ss117964737 14 70.09761 70.531684
ss86295351 15 61.349658 60.9330143
ss61538007 17 29.240631 28.9014
ss86318895 19 49.810291 49.6754
ss86339752 21 31.529569 31.4554
RFI ss61489474 3 7.649578 7.4018594
ss86274086 5 35.900142 36.024614
ss86290408 6 105.402482 105.5004543
ss86341687 12 72.395434 72.49734
ss86295351 15 61.349658 60.9330143
ss61538007 17 29.240631 28.9014
ss86303118 21 30.983757 31.4554
ADG ss86335501 5 33.048112 33.3044
ss86298158 17 12.72016 12.588374
ss86289007 24 4.017728 4.1530654
ss61547771 24 52.914946 52.7464
1

Chromosomal positions are Btau4.0 coordinates

2

Validation positions are taken from the published coordinates (or SNP IDs referenced in publicly accessible databases such as dbSNP) mapped to the Btau4.0 assembly. Where no IDs or genomic positions were given, but a linkage map was referenced, positions correspond to that of the closest marker in the referenced map identified by BLAST and BLAT searches of published primer sequences.