Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 19;37(8):925–934. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jss062

Table II.

Hierarchical Regressions of the Interaction of Self-Control and Emotional Processing and Diabetes-Specific Resources Predicting HbA1c

Model Step Variable(s) R2 ΔR2 F B(SE) β t 95% CI
Emotional processing and self-control 1 .09 6.10**
Pump status –0.84* (0.38) –.20 2.00 (−0.001 to 0.21)
Length since diagnosis 0.10 (0.06) .16 –2.58 (−1.48 to −0.19)
2 .16 .07** 6.13**
Self-control (SC) –0.63* (0.26) –.19 –2.42 (−1.14 to −0.11)
Emotional processing (EP) –0.091 (0.05) –.14 –1.73 (−0.20 to 0.01)
3 .22 .06** 7.07**
SC × EP 0.24** (0.08) .24 3.04 (0.08 to 0.40)
SC × EP utility versus self-efficacy for diabetes management 1 .09 6.10**
Pump status −0.81* (0.32) −.20 2.16 (0.01 to 0.21)
Length since diagnosis 0.11* (0.05) .17 −2.50 (−1.45 to −0.17)
2 .16 .08** 8.29***
Self-efficacy for diabetes management −0.18 (0.10) −.16 −1.80 (−0.39 to 0.02)
3 .24 .08** 6.54**
SC −0.41 (0.28) −.13 −1.46 (−0.97 to 0.15)
EP −0.06 (0.06) −.09 −1.09 (−0.17 to 0.05)
SC × EP 0.23** (0.08) .23 2.92 (0.07 to .38)
SC × EP utility versus diabetes-specific negative affect 1 .09 6.10**
Pump status −0.79* (0.33) −.19 2.07 (0.005 to 0.21)
Length since diagnosis 0.11* (0.05) .17 −2.43 (−1.44 to −0.15)
2 .14 .05** 6.80**
Diabetes-specific Negative Affect 0.29 (0.19) .13 1.51 (−0.09 to 0.67)
3 .24 .10** 6.33**
SC −0.44 (0.29) −.14 −1.52 (−1.00 to 0.13)
EP −0.09 (0.05) −.13 −1.60 (−0.20 to 0.02)
SC × EP 0.24** (0.08) .24 3.00 (0.08 to 0.40)
SC × EP utility versus adherence 1 .09 6.10**
Pump status −0.75 (0.33) −.18 1.93 (−0.003 to 0.20)
Length since diagnosis 0.10 (0.05) .15 −2.30 (−1.40 to −0.10)
2 .13 .05** 6.51**
Adherence −0.36 (0.29) −.11 −1.25 (−0.92 to 0.21)
3 .23 .10** 6.28**
SC −0.55* (0.27) −.17 −2.02 (−1.08 to −.01)
EP −0.07 (0.06) −.11 −1.35 (−0.18 to 0.04)
SC × EP 0.24** (0.08) .24 3.00 (0.08 to 0.39)

Note. All B(SE), β, t, and CI are from Block 3 of each regression. Significant effects are bold.

*p < .05, **p < .01.