Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 22;6(5):377–398. doi: 10.1007/s11571-012-9195-z

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Schematic representation of the temporal relationship between all the components of CR(t) as defined by Eq. 11 at F(p) = K. Note that rectangle in the central part is function g1(t) multiplied by product A01A02Kg3(φ). It makes most probable crossing of Λ0 by a random process N(t) near the time at which US occurs. In contrast, the non-associative part of CR(t), connected with earlier portions of the CS is due to crossing of Λ0 by a process N(t) long before the time at which US appears. It occurs with much lower probability than that of the associative part of CR(t). Pavlov believed that the earlier portion of the CS developed a conditioned inhibition and called it inhibition of delay. Note that the timing of CR(t) is defined by interaction of two major delay sources: the limbic delay time (τdl) and the first passage time (τfp) of N(t) through threshold Λ0. The other temporal parameters such as peak time (τp). duration (τd) and the times of CR onset (τon) and offset (τoff) are only different combinations of these two major delay sources, which allows estimation of variability for each parameter (see Eq. 12) in terms of CVs of these two sources