Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 20;6(5):409–419. doi: 10.1007/s11571-012-9197-x

Table 1.

Behavioral results (reaction time), ERP results (the peak latency and amplitude of N1, P2, and P3), and their statistical comparison (one-way ANOVA)

Target sensory Unimodal target Multimodal target One-way ANOVA
Mean ± SE Bimodal A Bimodal B Trimodal F value P value
Mean ± SE Mean ± SE Mean ± SE
RT (ms)
 V 426 ± 13 422 ± 13 429 ± 13 421 ± 15
 A 538 ± 14 555 ± 18 552 ± 14 555 ± 17
 S 576 ± 18 548 ± 17 552 ± 17 545 ± 16
N1 lat. (ms)
 V 140 ± 4 139 ± 4 136 ± 3 136 ± 3 0.362 0.781
 A 129 ± 4 130 ± 4 127 ± 4 126 ± 4 0.2 0.9
 S 142 ± 6 125 ± 5 124 ± 5 118 ± 4 4.297 0.007
N1 amp. (μV)
 V −3.4 ± 0.6 −5.4 ± 0.7 −3.6 ± 0.6 −5.5 ± 0.6 3.361 0.023
 A −10.7 ± 1 −10.9 ± 0.8 −11.3 ± 1 −11.7 ± 1 2.952 0.038
 S −2 ± 0.6 −8 ± 1 −3.8 ± 0.7 −10.1 ± 1.1 17.33 <0.001
P2 lat. (ms)
 V 193 ± 5 203 ± 4 195 ± 5 201 ± 4 2.937 0.039
 A 220 ± 4 224 ± 6 199 ± 5 201 ± 6 6.196 <0.001
 S 215 ± 8 210 ± 5 190 ± 8 192 ± 5 3.87 0.012
P2 amp. (μV)
 V 3.6 ± 1.1 6.6 ± 1.3 4.5 ± 1 7.3 ± 1.1 3.567 0.018
 A 5.1 ± 1.1 6.9 ± 1.2 4.6 ± 1.1 4.8 ± 1.1 0.934 0.429
 S 7.1 ± 0.8 12.6 ± 1.4 6.9 ± 1 11.6 ± 1.7 5.607 0.002
P3 lat. (ms)
 V 403 ± 12 392 ± 11 394 ± 11 381 ± 10 0.681 0.565
 A 455 ± 17 467 ± 21 470 ± 21 470 ± 20 0.019 0.99
 S 479 ± 18 452 ± 16 455 ± 17 449 ± 19 3.703 0.015
P3 amp. (μV)
 V 13.3 ± 1.7 9.9 ± 1.5 12.4 ± 1.6 10.3 ± 1.4 0.93 0.43
 A 9.4 ± 1.5 8.8 ± 1.4 7.7 ± 1.1 8.1 ± 1.3 0.403 0.75
 S 11.7 ± 1.2 10.6 ± 1.2 11.6 ± 1.4 9.8 ± 1.5 3.035 0.034