Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 11;6:65. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00065

Table 1.

Comparison of performance between the control and noise-exposed rats in a quiet and a noisy environment.

ΔFs 50% 40% 30% 20% Grand Mean
Control (N = 9) Quiet (n = 9) 78.3 ± 2.4 80.0 ± 2.2 86.1 ± 1.3 85.0 ± 4.4 81.3 ± 1.5
*** *** ***
Noisy (n = 3) 73.6 ± 8.2 52.8 ± 14.5 64.8 ± 5.6 62.7 ± 7.2 62.4 ± 9.4
** *** ***
Noise-exposed (N = 6) Noisy (n = 6) 69.5 ± 3.5 72.0 ± 4.8 84.2 ± 4.1 84.9 ± 2.6 77.1 ± 4.9
Quiet (n = 6) 78.8 ± 6.5 83.1 ± 3.8 80.1 ± 0.7 74.4 ± 3.2 79.7 ± 4.4

The letter n indicates that n out of N rats were tested in each condition (quiet or noisy environment). Each value (mean ± SEM) is the averaged hit rate across the tested rats for each ΔF. The asterisks indicate statistically significant difference between the two adjacent groups: [(control || quiet) vs. (control || noisy)] and [(control || noisy) vs. (noise-exposed || noisy)]. Number of asterisks indicates the level of significance of Mann–Whitney Rank Sum Test:

**

, P < 0.01;

***

, P < 0.001. The grand mean is the averaged hit rate across all the tested ΔFs for each experimental group (across row).