Skip to main content
. 2011 Oct 18;3(1):134–140. doi: 10.3892/etm.2011.368

Table IV.

Summary of quality of life (QOL) scales – one-sided p-value (12–17 weeks).

Authors/(Refs.) Test Treatment Global QOL Fatigue Nausea and vomiting Pain Dyspnoea Insomnia Appetite loss Constipation
Combining p-value of inverse normal methodd 0.016 0.007 <0.001 0.160 0.360 0.140 0.027 0.001
Rosell et al (21) Wei Johnson test of stochastic ordering CDDP (0.939) (0.955) (0.149) 0.971 (0.163) (0.985) (0.468)
CBDCA 0.042a
Scagliotti (22) One-way ANOVAb CDDP - 0.910 - - - 0.750 -
CBDCA 0.003a
Danson et al (23) -b CDDP 0.992 0.990 0.998
CBDCA 0.015a 0.001a <0.001a 0.045a 0.001a
Paccagnella et al (24) Repeated measure ANOVA CDDP (0.400) (0.150) (0.470) (0.170)
CBDCA <0.001a 0.015a 0.005a 0.005a
Rudd et al (25) Mann-Whitney U testc CDDP (0.720) 0.840 (0.750) (0.250)
CBDCA 0.060a 0.095a 0.020a 0.290a
Booton et al (26) Mann-Whitney U testb CDDP (0.999) (0.999) 0.995
CBDCA 0.500a 0.009a 0.500a 0.500a 0.500a

CDDP, cisplatin; CBDCA, carboplatin; p-value, two-sided p-value. One-sided p-value could not be calculated since the direction (positive or negative) was not reported.

a

One-sided p-value, in favour of CBDCA.

b

Two-sided p-value was calculated by t-test using scores of QOL scale since the p-value of the difference from the regimens was not provided in the literature [Booton (26): two-sided p-value in nausea and vomiting was provided in the literature].

c

We decided whether the result was negative or positive using the median and interquartile ranges that were reported in the trial.

d

p<0.05 reflects a favorable outcome in CBDCA arm. Numbers in bold indicate the scale of a favorable outcome in CBDCA arm.