Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 14;3(6):1072–1076. doi: 10.3892/etm.2012.514

Table I.

Summary of the studies included in the meta-analysis.

Quality scores
Author/year (ref.) Country Method Cut-off TP FP FN TN STARD QUADAS
Fiorelli et al, 2011 (51) Italy ELISA 652 pg/ml 31 5 18 25 15 11
Chen et al, 2010 (50) China PCR NA 76 4 16 32 14 10
Zhou et al, 2009 (49) China ELISA 1.6 ng/ml 44 25 18 39 17 12
Duysinx et al, 2008 (48) Belgium ELISA 382 pg/ml 44 18 20 21 17 11
Cheng et al, 2008 (47) China PCR NA 11 9 3 5 12 9
Xue et al, 2007 (46) China ELISA 945.7 pg/ml 34 7 8 38 17 12
Shu et al, 2007 (45) China ELISA 959.25 pg/ml 15 2 17 47 20 13
Sack et al, 2005 (44) Germany ELISA NA 77 50 19 68 16 11
Momi et al, 2002 (43) Japan ELISA 2000 pg/ml 38 14 0 75 15 11
Yeo et al, 1993 (42) USA IFA 10 pm 18 7 7 20 11 10

TP, true positive; FP, false positive; FN, false negative; TN, true negative; QUADAS, quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy; STARD, standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; IFA, immunofluorometric assay; NA, not applicable.