Skip to main content
. 2012 May 9;11:161. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-161

Table 5.

Instrumental variables probit regression results for the malaria model (n = 5,340)

Variable Marginal effect 1 95% Confidence interval 2
Lower CI Upper CI
wealth (predicted)
−0.007
−0.041
0.027
age2_yn
* 0.038
0.019
0.058
age3_yn
* 0.034
0.014
0.054
age4_yn
* 0.052
0.030
0.073
farming
0.009
−0.014
0.032
trips
0.0002
−0.006
0.006
education
−0.002
−0.047
0.043
itn_yn
* -0.016
−0.031
−0.001
improof_yn
−0.015
−0.043
0.014
impwall_yn
* -0.047
−0.072
−0.021
irs_yn
* -0.036
−0.070
−0.001
rural_yn
* 0.035
0.005
0.066
nov_yn
0.023
−0.009
0.056
dec_yn
0.032
−0.002
0.066
jan_yn
* 0.043
0.007
0.079
feb_yn
0.042
−0.010
0.093
elevation
* -0.051
−0.069
−0.033
HF_dist
* 0.001
0.00004
0.002
lake_dist
* -0.0002
−0.0004
−0.0001
rain_dev
* 0.229
0.185
0.272
roads10
* -115.882
−150.108
−81.655
rivers3
* 0.673
0.110
1.236
farmland
* 0.193
0.138
0.247
slope_cv 0.012 −0.034 0.058

1* Indicates statistical significance at the 0.05 significance level or better.

2 The estimation of standard errors was adjusted for clustering on households to account for possible non-independence of observations within households. It is expected that children in the same household are similar to each other on account of shared genetics and/or home environment.