Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 11;7(9):e44684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044684

Table 2. Results of redundancy analysis of the 6,918 DArT marker probe sequences under four different sets of assembly parameters from the most stringent (A1) to the most relaxed (A4) (see Material and Methods for details).

Parameter A1 A2 A3 A4
Word length 18 14 12 10
Index Word length 13 12 11 10
Mismatches 10% 15% 20% 20%
Ambiguities per read 4 4 16 16
Maximum % gaps per read 10% 15% 20% 20%
Gap size 1bp 2bp 5bp 5bp
Results of redundancy analysis
# Unmatched singletona 3,209 2,607 2,381 2,276
# Redundant sequencesb 3,709 4,311 4,537 4,642
# Unique non-redundantsequencesc 1,374 1,537 1,587 1,588
Total selected sequencesd 4,583 4,144 3,968 3,864
Estimated rate of sequenceredundancy 33.75% 40.0% 42.64% 44.14%
a

Unique sequences not matching any of the other reads.

b

Sequences that fall into multi-sequence clusters with more than two sequences per cluster.

c

Unique sequences drawn from the redundant clusters.

d

Sum of unmatched singleton and non-redundant sequences.