Short Summary
A study among young people in South Africa found a 13% prevalence of concurrent sexual partnerships. Concurrency was correlated with other risky sexual behaviors, race and partner fidelity.
Concurrency or overlapping sexual partnerships is a critical element of partnership dynamics that plays an important role in HIV transmission.1-5 In South Africa, numerous qualitative and quantitative studies have found a high prevalence of concurrency as well as documented social and cultural norms that enable or condone such partnerships.6-8 In South Africa, young people remain at high risk for HIV infection. In 2008, 5.1% of young men and 21.1% of young women, aged 20-24 were estimated to be infected with HIV.9 In 2008, 30% of young men, age 15-24 reported more than one partner in the past twelve months, an increase from 23% in 2002.9 Few studies have explicitly examined factors associated with concurrency in South Africa. It is critically important to understand these factors to ensure that HIV prevention interventions that address concurrency are appropriately targeted and grounded in evidence. This study examines the prevalence and factors that are associated with concurrency among a population in South Africa to inform the evidence base.
The analysis utilizes data from the Cape Area Panel Study, a representative sample of 3,536 young people, aged 16-26 living in the Cape Metropolitan Area (CMA), South Africa in 2005. Details of the survey and sampling have been previously published.10 This analysis is restricted to 2,127 sexually active young adults, defined as having ever engaged in full penetrative sex. The study received ethical approval from the University of Cape Town and the Harvard School of Public Health. A stepwise backward elimination model building process using survey (svy) methodology was conducted in Stata 9.0 (College Station, TX). The outcome of interest was reporting having “had sex with a concurrent partner while in the most recent sexual partnership”.
The sampled youth were nearly evenly divided by sex and represented three racial groups (identified using South African census terminology) in proportions that reflect the unique racial composition of Western Cape: Black African – 37.1%, Coloured – 49.3%, and White – 13.6%. The ages of the respondents ranged from 16 to 26 years, with a mean age of 21 years. The mean age of sexual debut was 16.7 years. The mean number of lifetime sexual partners was 2.2 partners. (See Table 1.) Overall, 12.8% of youth reported a concurrent partnership during their last sexual partnership. This masks significant differences in reporting between men and women, (20.4% and 6.2%, respectively). Black respondents were significantly more likely than Coloureds or Whites to report concurrency – 21.8% versus 8.6% and 2.9% respectively.
Table 1.
Total | |||
---|---|---|---|
Variable Description | na | na | %b |
Sex | 2486 | ||
Young men | 1145 | 47.9 | |
Young women | 1341 | 52.1 | |
Age | 2486 | ||
15-19 years | 665 | 22.9 | |
20-24 years | 1575 | 66.0 | |
≥25 years | 246 | 11.1 | |
Race | 2486 | ||
Black | 1313 | 37.1 | |
Coloured | 1012 | 49.3 | |
White | 161 | 13.6 | |
Education | 2486 | ||
Out of school | 1012 | 39.1 | |
In Primary/Secondary school | 435 | 12.8 | |
Out of school (completed grade 12) | 812 | 36.4 | |
In school (post-matric) | 227 | 11.7 | |
Personal Monthly Income | 2486 | ||
No income | 1493 | 53.2 | |
Some income | 993 | 46.8 | |
Religion | 2462 | ||
No religion | 340 | 11.4 | |
Mainline Christian | 1127 | 49.6 | |
AICc/Zion/Independent | 591 | 21.3 | |
Muslim | 199 | 9.1 | |
Other Affiliations/Denominations | 205 | 8.6 | |
Current Marital Status | 2481 | ||
Unmarried | 2287 | 90.8 | |
Married | 194 | 9.2 | |
Self-Assessed HIV Risk | 2476 | ||
No risk | 954 | 37.8 | |
Some risk | 1290 | 53.4 | |
HIV+/Refused/Don't know | 232 | 8.8 | |
Age of Sexual Debut | 2435 | ||
≤14 years | 343 | 12.5 | |
15-19 years | 1908 | 77.8 | |
20-24 years | 184 | 9.7 | |
Time Since Sexual Debut | 2263 | ||
0-2 years | 546 | 24.4 | |
3-4 years | 666 | 28.6 | |
5-6 years | 613 | 27.2 | |
7+ years | 438 | 19.9 | |
# Lifetime Sexual Partners | 2386 | ||
1-3 | 2041 | 85.19 | |
4 | 152 | 6.50 | |
5+ | 193 | 8.31 | |
Age Gap w/ Most Recent Partner | 2486 | ||
Partner is 4 or less years older/younger | 1918 | 77.8 | |
Partner is 5 or more years older | 51 | 1.9 | |
Partner is 5 or more years younger | 517 | 20.3 | |
Most Recent Partner's Concurrency | 2345 | ||
Partner did not have concurrent partners | 2002 | 87.8 | |
Partner did have concurrent partners | 343 | 12.2 | |
Co-Residence with Most Recent Partner | 2345 | ||
Does co-reside | 453 | 23.5 | |
Does not co-reside | 1892 | 76.5 | |
Condom Use with Most Recent Partner | 2358 | ||
Never use | 544 | 24.7 | |
Consistently use | 1071 | 43.1 | |
Inconsistently use | 743 | 32.2 |
Unweighted
Weighted
AIC - African Independent Churches
The final regression results are presented in Table 2. Young women were significantly less likely to report concurrency, compared to young men, after adjusting for other factors (P<0.01). Time since sexual debut was significant for individuals who were sexually active for 5-6 or 7+ years (P=0.01, P<0.01, respectively) compared to those who debuted 0-2 years ago. Individuals who reported having five or more lifetime sexual partners were significantly more likely to report concurrency compared to those with 1-3 lifetime sexual partners (P<0.01). The strongest positive correlate of concurrency was knowledge that a partner had a concurrent partner (adj.OR=5.52, P<0.01). Self-assessed HIV risk, personal income, religion, and age gap, co-residence and condom use with the most recent partner did not achieve significance in earlier models (data not presented) to warrant inclusion in the final model. Post-estimation statistics indicate that the model was a good fit to the data and the discriminative capacity of the model was strong. Various tests indicated that collinearity among variables was unlikely.
Table 2.
Multivariate | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Variable Description | % | aOR | (95% CI) | p value |
Total | 12.8 | |||
Sex | ||||
Young men | 20.4 | 1.00 | ||
Young women | 6.2 | 0.21 | 0.15-0.30 | <0.01 |
Age | ||||
15-19 years | 14.0 | 1.00 | ||
20-24 years | 12.6 | 0.54 | 0.35-0.83 | 0.01 |
≥25 years | 11.4 | 0.31 | 0.16-0.60 | <0.01 |
Race | ||||
Black | 21.8 | 1.00 | ||
Coloured | 8.6 | 0.41 | 0.29-0.58 | <0.01 |
White | 2.9 | 0.18 | 0.06-0.58 | <0.01 |
Education | ||||
Out of school | 14.6 | 1.00 | ||
In Primary/Secondary school | 14.9 | 0.68 | 0.42-1.10 | 0.12 |
Out of school (completed grade 12) | 12.4 | 0.98 | 0.70-1.39 | 0.93 |
In school (post-matric) | 5.6 | 0.41 | 0.20-0.87 | 0.02 |
Current Marital Status | ||||
Unmarried | 14.0 | 1.00 | ||
Married | 2.3 | 0.19 | 0.08-0.49 | <0.01 |
Time Since Sexual Debut | ||||
0-2 years | 6.9 | 1.00 | ||
3-4 years | 11.0 | 1.32 | 0.80-2.18 | 0.27 |
5-6 years | 15.2 | 2.11 | 1.23-3.62 | 0.01 |
7+ years | 19.5 | 2.46 | 1.37-4.41 | <0.01 |
# Lifetime Sexual Partners | ||||
1-3 | 10.5 | 1.00 | ||
4 | 18.8 | 1.77 | 0.98-3.21 | 0.06 |
5+ | 32.4 | 2.94 | 1.93-4.48 | <0.01 |
Most Recent Partner's Concurrency Status |
||||
Partner did not have concurrent partners | 9.6 | 1.00 | ||
Partner did have concurrent partners | 35.7 | 5.52 | 3.95-7.71 | <0.01 |
N | 2127 | |||
| ||||
Log pseudolikelihood | −621.5 | |||
| ||||
Likelihood ratio test (p-value) | 0.000 | |||
| ||||
Area under the ROC curve | 0.822 | |||
| ||||
Hosmer-Lemeshow Goodness-of-fit test (p- value) |
0.39 |
All p-values are based on the Wald statistic
AIC: African Independent Churches
Likelihood ratio test - comparing previous models (not shown) to final model
Overall, this study found varying levels of concurrency among different sub-populations of young adults in the Cape Metropolitan Area. Such varying levels of concurrency among different sub-populations could be one factor, among many including male circumcision and condom use, resulting in the heterogeneous spread and persistence of HIV among communities in South Africa. Different levels of concurrency correlated with racial groups and STDs (i.e. gonorrhea) have been observed in other populations11 Race in South Africa may be one proxy for economic, cultural and social norms and patterns that govern sexual behaviors, assuming sexual mixing between races is homogeneous.12
That young men report more concurrency than young women is in agreement with other studies, as well as with similar research that indicate that young men report more sexual risk behaviors compared to young women.13, 14 However, it is evident that a significant minority of women do have concurrent partners. This fact is critical for enabling the sustained transmission of HIV through sexual networks. The reported levels of concurrency found here among young men and women are likely large enough to enable a large and robust sexual network, similar to that described by others, though further modeling would be necessary to determine this.15
Previous research has demonstrated that some high risk sexual behaviors tend to occur in the same individuals.16 I hypothesized that concurrency is another risk behavior that occurs in tandem with other behaviors that are known to be high risk, such as a large number of sexual partners and an early age of sexual debut. It is possible that social or cultural drivers of these behaviors may be similar. For instance, notions of masculinity and social and peer acceptance among young men may promote multiple girlfriends, concurrency and an earlier age of sexual debut.17-19 The analysis found that concurrency was correlated with larger numbers of lifetime partners, among both Blacks and Coloureds. This correlation can partly be explained by the inclusion of individuals who have ever had only one lifetime partner, which may exaggerate the effect of having larger numbers of partners. However, among Blacks, the correlation was significantly evident only with five or more partners, indicating that the correlation would likely hold even if individuals with only one lifetime partner were excluded from the analysis. One possible explanation is that as this young population acquires sexual partners, many do so concurrently rather than serially.
The correlation between concurrency and time since sexual debut indicate that a longer exposure time to possible concurrent partnerships and therefore an earlier age of sexual debut is correlated with concurrency. Overall concurrency does appear to occur alongside other higher risk sexual activities, namely an early age of sexual debut (as measured by time since sexual debut) and higher numbers of lifetime sex partners.
Qualitative research from southern Africa indicates that there is a strong association between concurrency and sexual partnerships, in general, and material or financial transactions.6, 20, 21 The lack of an association in this study between income and concurrency could have occurred for multiple reasons. Firstly, income for young people may not be an appropriate proxy for measuring transactional elements of sexual partnerships. Secondly, young people may have small incomes from their households that were not reported. Thirdly, individuals in lower income quintiles may spend larger proportions of their income on partnerships compared to individuals in higher income quintiles.22 Further research using more refined notions of wealth and income may be required to understand the relationship between income or wealth and concurrency.
Another important finding is the strong correlation between concurrency and knowledge that a partner has concurrent partners. Although causation cannot be demonstrated, there are several possibilities to explain this link. Individuals may choose partners like themselves who are unlikely to be in monogamous partnerships. Alternatively, individuals after initiating a partnership and learning of their partners' infidelities may be more likely to engage in concurrent partnerships. In either case, this demonstrates the importance of social norms that either condone or condemn concurrent partnerships. If such partnerships are condoned, partners may be more likely to engage themselves in the behavior. The programmatic implications of this finding point to the fact that perceptions of concurrency within a community or at least partner's concurrency may be an important determinant. Decreasing the levels of concurrency within a population will have the double benefit of reducing concurrency itself and reducing a potential motivating factor (partner's concurrency). However, this finding should be considered cautiously, since reporting on partner behaviors may be unreliable.23
This analysis has several other limitations that should be considered. First, the definition of the dependent variable may underestimate the true occurrence of concurrency in this population. Additionally, it is possible that responses related to sexual history were influenced by several differential biases, including recall and social desirability bias. However, such biases are likely to result in the estimates of prevalence being too low, rather than too high. The cross-sectional nature of the analysis does not allow causal associations to be made between concurrency and the other variables.
In conclusion, concurrency is prevalent among a significant minority of the study population. HIV prevention interventions that address concurrency need to consider the various social, economic and cultural factors that influence peoples' engagement in concurrency. Additionally, concurrency messages may need to be tailored to specific sub-populations (e.g. young Black men) and may be appropriate for some populations, while not for others. The clustering of sexual risk factors that accompany concurrency among young people demonstrates the need for more interventions to address sex in a comprehensive manner. Additional research to understand the causal links between determinants of concurrency, concurrency, and HIV acquisition and transmission are still needed.
Acknowledgement/Sources of Support
Funding was provided by the AIDS Prevention Research Project at the Harvard School of Public Health. Funding for the survey was provided by the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. The views expressed in this article are not necessarily those of USAID.
References
- 1.Mah TL, Halperin DT. Concurrent sexual partnerships and the HIV epidemics in Africa: Evidence to move forward. AIDS and Behavior. 2008 doi: 10.1007/s10461-008-9433-x. EPub. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Halperin DT, Epstein H. Concurrent sexual partnerships help to explain Africa's high HIV prevalence: Implications for prevention. Lancet. 2004;364:4–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16606-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shelton JD. Ten myths and one truth about generalised HIV epidemics. Lancet. 2007;370:1809–1811. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61755-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Morris M, Kretzschmar M. Concurrent partnerships and the spread of HIV. AIDS. 1997;11:641–648. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199705000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.SADC Expert think tank meeting on HIV prevention in high-prevalence countries in southern Africa: Report. 2006 www.sadc.int/archives/read/news/802. Accessed March 15, 2009.
- 6.Parker W, Makhubele B, Ntlabati P, Connolly C. Concurrent Sexual Partnerships Amongst Young Adults in South Africa. CADRE; Johannesburg, South Africa: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harrison A, Cleland J, Frohlich J. Young people's sexual partnerships in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: Patterns, contextual Influences, and HIV risk. Studies in Family Planning. 2008;39:295–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2008.00176.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leclerc-Madlala S. Age-disparate and intergenerational sex in southern Africa: The dynamics of hypervulnerability. AIDS. 2008;22(supp 4):S17–S25. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000341774.86500.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shisana O, Rehle T, Simbayi LC, et al. South African national HIV prevalence, incidence, behaviour and communcation survey 2008: A turning tide among teenagers? 2009 http://www.hsrc.ac.za/Document-3238.phtml. Accessed July 20, 2009.
- 10.Lam D, Seekings J, Sparks M. The Cape Area panel study: Overview and technical documentation for waves 1-2-3. 2006 http://caps.psc.isr.umich.edu/documentation/. Accessed March 21, 2009.
- 11.Hudson CP. Concurrent partnerships, ethnicity, STD and HIV. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 1998;9:243. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laumann EO, Youm Y. Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: A network explanation. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 1999;26:250–261. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199905000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Carter MW, Kraft JM, Koppenhaver T, et al. ‘A bull cannot be contained in a single kraal’: Concurrent sexual partnerships in Botswana. AIDS and Behavior. 2007;11:822–830. doi: 10.1007/s10461-006-9203-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shisana O, Rehle T, Simbayi L, et al. South African National HIV Prevalence, HIV Incidence, Behaviour and Communications Survey. 2005 http://www.hsrc.ac.za/Research_Publication-5638.phtml. Accessed March 10, 2009.
- 15.Helleringer S, Kohler H-P. Sexual network structure and the spread of HIV in Africa: evidence from Likoma Island, Malawi. AIDS. 2007;21:2323–2332. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328285df98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.White R, Cleland J, Caraël M. Links between premarital sexual behaviour and extramarital intercourse: a multi-site analysis. AIDS. 2000;14:2323–2331. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200010200-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Harrison A, O'Sullivan LF, Hoffman S, Dolezal C, Morrell R. Gender role and relationship norms among young adults in South Africa: Measuring the context of masculinity and HIV risk. Journal of Urban Health. 2006;83:709–722. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9077-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hallett TB, Lewis JJC, Lopman BA, et al. Age at first sex and HIV infection in Rural Zimbabwe. Studies in Family Planning. 2007;38:1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2007.00111.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pettifor AE, Rees HV, Kleinschmidt I, et al. Young people's sexual health in South Africa: HIV prevalence and sexual behaviors from a nationally representative household survey. AIDS. 2005;19:1525–1534. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000183129.16830.06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Soul City Research Unit . HIV prevention: Multiple and concurrent sexual partnerships among youths and adults in South Africa. Soul City Institute; Johannesburg: 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Leclerc-Madlala S. Transactional sex and the pursuit of modernity. Social Dynamics. 2003;29:213–233. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Luke N. Economic status, informal exchange, and sexual risk in Kisumu, Kenya. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 2008;56:375–396. doi: 10.1086/522896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lenoir CD, Adler NE, Borzekowski DLG, Tschann JM, Ellen JM. What you don't know can hurt you: Perceptions of sex-partner concurrency and partner-reported behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2006;38:179–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]