Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012 Nov 1;34(11):2188–2200. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.012

Table 4.

Decompositions with pooled reference group

Subjective Risk Objective Risk Harm to Child Substantiation
Raw difference .058 −.104 −.041+ −.134*
Model 1: race and geographic factors
Explained .119 (.086) .031 (.115) −.040+ (.024) −.073 (.046)
Percent 205.17% −29.81% 97.56% 54.48%
Unexplained −.062 (.097) −.135 (.175) −.001 (.031) −.061 (.046)
Percent −106.90% 129.81% 2.44% 45.52%
Model 2: add caseworker characteristics
Explained .113 (.082) .034 (.115) −.047+ (.024) −.091* (.045)
Percent 194.83% −32.69% 114.63% 67.91%
Unexplained −.056 (.092) −.138 (.168) .005 (.028) −.043 (.042)
Percent −96.55% 132.69% −12.20% 32.09%
Model 3: add case characteristics
Explained .157* (.079) .073 (.110) −.041 (.026) −.101* (.045)
Percent 270.69% −70.19% 100.00% 75.37%
Unexplained −.100 (.092) −.178 (.168) −.000 (.028) −.033 (.039)
Percent −172.41% 171.15% 0.00% 24.63%
Model 4: add sociodemographics
Explained .069 (.091) −.116 (.121) −.012 (.024) −.088+ (.045)
Percent 118.97% 111.54% 29.27% 65.67%
Unexplained −.011 (.093) .012 (.173) −.029 (.028) −.046 (.039)
Percent −18.97% −11.54% 70.73% 34.33%
Model 5: add risk and harm
Explained −.099* (.048)
Percent 73.88%
Unexplained −.035 (.037)
Percent 26.12%

Notes: 1,461 observations. Standard errors in parentheses. Percentages based on absolute values. Percentage totals may not sum to 100 due to rounding. Covariates in each block are listed in Table 1.

+

p < .10;

*

p < .05