Table 1.
Comparison with other methods
| Method | miRNAs |
piRNAs |
snoRNAs |
sncRNAs |
tRNAs |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| transcripts | reads | transcripts | reads | transcripts | reads | transcripts | reads | transcripts | reads | |
| NorahDesk | 246 | 4 497 220 | 9 | 1150 | 12 | 1237 | 3 | 103 | 0 | 0 |
| Dario | 427 | 4 811 848 | NA | NA | 282 | 43 075 | NA | NA | 334 | 8486 |
| mirDeep2 | 442 | 8 781 481 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| mirDeep2 > 0 | 343 | 7 429 586 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| mirDeep2 > 9 | 208 | 3 712 002 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Number of transcripts and reads predicted by NORAHDESK, DARIO and MIRDEEP2. >0 and >9 show that the predicted miRNAs with MIRDEEP2 quality scores >0 and 9. The numbers are actual (not normalized) reads.