Skip to main content
. 2012 May 1;6(3):547–554. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600309

Table 2.

Blood Glucose Monitoring System Accuracy Results

Accuracy thresholda 75 mg/dl(4.2 mmol/liter) 100 mg/dl(5.6 mmol/liter) 100 mg/dl(5.6 mmol/liter) 72 mg/dl(4 mmol/liter) Secondary criteriaoutside of ±15 mg/dl(0.83 mmol/liter)/20%c
Accuracy criteriabelow / abovethe threshold Within ±15 mg/dl (0.83 mmol/liter)/20%b Within ±15 mg/dl (0.83 mmol/liter)/15% Within ±12 mg/dl (0.67 mmol/liter)/12.5% Within ±9 mg/dl (0.50 mmol/liter)/12.5%
Optium Xceed 216/216 (100%) 216/216 (100%) 211/216 (98%) 210/216 (97%) 0/216 (0.0%)
Accu-Chek Performa 209/214(98%) 196/214 (92%)d 185/214 (86%)f 185/214 (86%)f 5/214 (2.3%)
Contour TS 212/216 (98%) 209/216 (97%) 202/216 (94%) 201/216 (93%) 4/216 (1.9%)
Nova Max 201/216 (93%)d,e 192/216 (89%)e 179/216 (83%)e 176/216 (81%)e 15/216 (6.9%)
Nova StatStrip Xpress 184/185 (99%) 182/185 (98%) 172/185 (93%) 172/185 (93%) 1/185 (0.5%)
OneTouch Ultra2 207/214 (97%) 197/214 (92%)f 185/214 (86%)f 182/214 (85%)f 7/214 (3.3%)
a

Concentration at move from mg/dl difference to % difference from the reference value. Results are combined for above and below the accuracy threshold stated, as required by ISO 15197.

b

Current ISO and CLSI criteria.

c

A secondary criteria anticipated to be implemented to ensure all results are reported; there is expectation that a limit will be set (e.g., no more than x%, unknown at present).

Shaded areas indicate significant difference from

d

Optium Xceed and Nova StatStrip Xpress;

e

Optium Xceed, Nova StatStrip Xpress, and Contour TS; and

f

Optium Xceed only (p < .0034).