Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 1;6(4):938–946. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600427

Table 5.

Relative Difference in the Number of Required Handling Stepsa

Steps decrease with the fully integrated Accu-Chek Mobile compared with partly integrated and conventional systems (%)

BG meter Lancing device Accu-Chek Compact Plus
Accu-Chek Softclix Plus
Ascensia Breeze2
Ascensia Microlet
Accu-Chek Aviva
Accu-Chek Multiclix
Bayer Contour
Bayer Microlet 2
Bayer Contour USB
Bayer Microlet 2
BGStar
BGStar
FreeStyle Lite
FreeStyle
OneTouch Ultra 2
OneTouch Comfort
OneTouch VerioPro
OneTouch Verio
Mean
Accu-Chek Mobile versus partly integrated and conventional systems Steps decrease/ 1 testb 68 74 64 76 76 76 76 76 76 73

Accu-Chek Mobile versus partly integrated and conventional systems Steps decrease/ 100 testsc 64 70 62 72 72 72 72 73 73 70
a

Minimum and maximum values are given in bold font.

b

1 test = 1 routine BG measurement.

3

100 tests = 100 routine BG measurements + additional tasks necessary within this series.