Table 4. Comparison among the tri-peptide subsequence models with or without propensity.
Kernels | Sn (%) | P (%) | F-measure | ||
Tri-peptide | Propensity only | N.A. | 56.5±12.5 | 61.0±6.3 | 0.584±0.085 |
Tri-peptide | w./o. Propensity | Blosum62 | 54.5±6.5 | 60.5±1.5 | 0.573±0.035 |
PAM160 | 55.0±7.2 | 61.1±1.8 | 0.578±0.040 | ||
w./Propensity | Blosum 62 * | 80.1± 2.1 | 55.2± 1.0 | 0.693± 0.060 | |
PAM160 | 69.3±10.0 | 58.5±3.5 | 0.633±0.050 | ||
AA_A pattern | w./o. Propensity | Blosum62 | 54.8±6.8 | 60.5±1.5 | 0.579±0.040 |
PAM160 | 55.2±7.1 | 61.3±2.0 | 0.577±0.045 | ||
w./Propensity | Blosum62 | 60.5±5.5 | 57.5±2.5 | 0.589±0.040 | |
PAM160 | 59.5±5.5 | 57.5±1.5 | 0.585±0.035 | ||
A_AA pattern | w./o. Propensity | Blosum62 | 55.5±8.5 | 60.6±2.2 | 0.581±0.050 |
PAM160 | 55.2±8.1 | 60.5±1.5 | 0.577±0.055 | ||
w./Propensity | Blosum62 | 60.5±6.5 | 57.5±1.5 | 0.590±0.040 | |
PAM160 | 59.5±5.5 | 57.5±1.5 | 0.585±0.025 |
The corresponding model is defined as SVMTriP.