Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 12;7(9):e44630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044630

Table 1. Performance of ELISA and PCR assays in Definite TBM subjects.a .

PCR/ELISA Sensitivityb Specificityb PPVb NPVb LR+ LR−
qPCR 100 (88;100) 96 (91;99) 84 (69;93) 99 (96;100) 23 (10;53) 0.02 (0;0.27)
GlcB 100 (88;100) 96(91;99) 84 (69;93) 99 (96,100) 23 (10;53) 0.02 (0;0.27)
HspX 100 (88;100) 96 (91;99) 84 (69;93) 99 (96;100) 23 (10;53) 0.02 (0;0.27)
MPT 51 90 (73;98) 98(95;100) 93 (77;98) 98 (93;99) 58 (14;232) 0.11 (0.04;0.31)
Ag 85B 79 (60;92) 97 (92;99) 85 (67;94) 95 (90;98) 26 (10;68) 0.21 (0.1;0.44)
PstS1 100 (88;100) 97 (92;99) 87 (72;94) 99 (96;100) 29 (11;71) 0.02 (0;0.27)
a

using cut-offs determined from ROC analysis of ELISA/qPCR data from ‘Definite’ TBM and NTIM groups (true positives and true negatives, respectively).

b

Values are in percentages, values in brackets denote 95% confidence intervals.