Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2012 Jun 4;86(5):518–525. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.04.010

Table 2.

Unadjusted rates of dimensions of perceived mood and weight changes reported with oral contraceptive use at six-months among young women with baseline depressed mood and perceived stress

MOOD AND WEIGHT CHANGE DIMENSIONS
Type
X2 (P) r
n (%)
Severity
X2 (P) r
n (%)
Quality
X2 (P) r
n (%)
Attribution
X2 (P) r
n (%)
Reported mood changes
(overall, N=87, 25%)
More
n=73
Less
n=14
Little
n=43
Some
n=23
Lot
n=21
Good
n=18
Bad
N=41
Neither
n=28
Due to pill
n=40
Depressed mooda
(≥16-pts CES-D)
n=27/73 (37%) p=0.01
7.70 (0.02) −0.15 19.41 (<0.001) 0.21 3.23 (0.20) 0.08 0.53 (0.47) 0.04
n=23
(32%)
n=4
(29%)
n=9
(21%)
n=6
(26%)
n=12
(57%)
n=6
(33%)
n=11
(27%)
n=10
(36%)
n=10
(25%)
Perceived stressa
(≥21-pts PSS-10)
n=21/67 (31%) p=0.15
5.18 (0.08) −0.10 2.66 (0.50) 0.09 0.32 (0.85) 0.02 0.03 (0.85) 0.01
n=20
(27%)
n=1
(7%)
n=9
(21%)
n=6
(26%)
n=6
(29%)
n=3
(17%)
n=9
(22%)
n=9
(32%)
n=8
(20%)
Reported weight changes
(overall, N=200, 57%)
Gain
n=135
Loss
n=65
Little
n=104
Some
n=44
Lot
n=52
Good
n=67
Bad
N=79
Neither
n=52
Due to pill (vs. other)
n=102
Depressed Mooda
(≥16-pts CES-D)
n=51/73 (70%) p=0.02
8.32 (0.02) −0.10 9.40 (0.02) 0.11 4.07 (0.13) 0.07 2.08 (0.15) 0.08
n=31
(23%)
n=20
(31%)
n=25
(24%)
n=15
(34%)
n=11
(21%)
n=19
(28%)
n=18
(28%)
n=13
(25%)
N=26
(25%)
Perceived Stressa
(≥21-pts PSS-10)
n=42/67 (63%) p=0.26
1.31 (0.52) −0.05 5.40 (0.14) −0.01 0.65 (0.72) 0.01 0.04 (0.84) 0.01
n=28
(21%)
n=14
(22%)
n=25
(24%)
n=11
(25%)
n=6
(12%)
n=15
(22%)
n=14
(18%)
n=12
(23%)
n=20
(20%)

Center for Epidemiologic Studies – Depression Scale (CES-D); Perceived Stress Scale - 10 (PSS-10).

Depressed mood and perceived stress: Results are presented as numbers (n) and rates (%) of reported mood and weight changes overall (yes/no) among those with elevated depressed mood and perceived stress scores.

a

Pearson’s chi-square (X2) compares rates of overall reported mood and weight changes among those with and without depressed mood and perceived stress.

Columns 1–4: For dimensions of perceived side effects, results are presented as numbers (n) and rates (%) of dimensions of reported mood and weight changes. Statistical analysis for associations between depressed mood and stress and side effect dimensions are Pearson’s chi-square test (X2) with p-value (p) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). P-values considered statistically significant at alpha <0.05, <0.01, or <0.001 for all tests.