Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 4;2012:185484. doi: 10.1155/2012/185484

Table 2.

Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for infrequent fruit consumption, separate analyses for students in low, middle, and high family social classes.

Low family social class, n = 1141OR (95% CI) Middle family social class, n = 2478OR (95% CI) High family social class, n = 1384OR (95% CI)
Sexa
 Boys versus girls 1.80 (1.42–2.30)*** 1.82 (1.54–2.14)*** 1.60 (1.21–1.98)***

Gradea
 7th versus 5th 1.32 (1.00–1.74)* 1.20 (0.99–1.46) 1.07 (0.83–1.38)
 9th versus 5th 1.88 (1.38–2.57)*** 1.16 (0.95–1.43) 1.50 (1.13–1.99)**

Supermarket exposurea
 low versus high 1.17 (0.89–1.54) 1.17 (0.97–1.40) 1.08 (0.80–1.45)

Fast food outlet exposurea
 high versus low 1.32 (0.98–1.76) 1.18 (0.97–1.43) 1.23 (0.89–1.69)

Interaction supermarket* fast food exposureb
 (i) high, low 1.0 1.0 1.0
 (ii) low, high 1.60 (1.02–2.45)* 1.40 (1.03–1.90)* 1.45 (0.89–2.38)
 (iii) low, low 1.10 (0.78–1.54) 1.11 (0.88–1.40) 0.91 (0.64–1.29)
 (iv) high, high 1.17 (0.75–1.84) 1.09 (0.81–1.47) 0.94 (0.61–1.46)

aOdds ratios mutually adjusted for sex, grade, and supermarket and fast food outlet exposure.

bAdjusted for sex and grade.

Significant levels at *0.05, **0.01, ***0.001.