Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 22;279(1745):4192–4198. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1547

Table 1.

Results from the two-factor ANOVAs showing the influence of sex, predation and their interaction on time spent on all pairs of tested backgrounds in experiments 1–3: (i) matching (HO) versus mismatching background (VO), (ii) matching (HO) versus complex orientation (CO) and (iii) matching (HO) versus complex shape (CS). **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.

source d.f. F p
(i) experiment 1: horizontal (HO) versus vertical orientation (VO)
 sex 1 2.96 0.091
 predation 1 5.91 0.018*
 interaction 1 1.10 0.30
 residuals 56
(ii) experiment 2: horizontal (HO) versus complex orientation (CO)
 sex 1 4.34 0.040*
 predation 1 0.04 0.83
 interaction 1 3.00 0.087
 residuals 76
(iii) experiment 3: horizontal (HO) versus complex shape (CS)
 sex 1 11.08 0.0013**
 predation 1 2.08 0.15
 interaction 1 1.72 0.19
 residuals 76