Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 22;13(5):655–672. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0333-4

TABLE 2.

Electrical stimulation and drug treatment histories for eight cats

Cat no. Age at implantation, weeks Age at stimulation, weeks Stimulation period, weeks Stimulus Drug treatment Age at study, weeks No. of acoustic freqs. studied No. of electrical channels studied
K335 7.5 9 17 BP 1,2 and 5,6—speech processor, 1,100 pps None 26 4
K327a 6 7 23 BP 1,3b and 5,6—speech processor, 1,100 pps Rasagiline, systemic, 10 weeks 30 4
K336a 5.5 Not stimulated Artificial perilymph, infusion pump, 10 weeks 16 5
K313 5 10 13 BP 1,2 and 5,6—speech processor, 1,100 pps BDNF, infusion pump, 11 weeks 23 4
K319 5 8 20 BP 1,2 and 5,6—speech processor, 1,100 pps BDNF, infusion pump, 11 weeks 28 1
K329 4 7 22 BP 1,2 and 5,6: 300 pps/30 Hz; BDNF, infusion pump, 10 weeks 29 5
K328 Normal hearing cat 26 11 4
K338 Normal hearing cat 31 9 4

BP bipolar, pps pulses per second

aCats that received dexamethasone through the osmotic pump during the first several days after cochlear implantation

bK327 had 1,3 bipolar pair stimulated for most of the stimulation period due to the failure of wire # 2