Skip to main content
. 2012 May 28;27(5):886–894. doi: 10.1093/her/cys063

Table II.

Clinic Staff Survey responses about FLU-FOBT Program activities performed during the RCT (January 2010) and 1 year later (January 2011)

During RCT N (%) (January 2010) 1 year post-RCT N (%) (January 2011) P-value
Personally checked electronic record or paper chart to determine which patients are due for FOBT 33 (80.5%) 32 (78.1%) 0.76
Personally offered FOBT to eligible patients with influenza vaccinations 39 (95.1%) 26 (63.4%) <0.01
Personally explained to patients why FOBT is important 31 (75.6%) 36 (87.8%) 0.10
Personally explained to patients how to do FOBT 36 (87.8%) 36 (87.8%) 1.00
Used low literacy multilingual instructions 21 (51.2%) 24 (58.5%) 0.47
Used visual aids for FOBT instructions 27 (65.9%) 26 (63.4%) 0.81
Used multilingual FOBT video instructions 4 (9.8%) 21 (51.2%) <0.01
Provided mailing kits with FOBT 32 (78.1%) 35 (85.4%) 0.18
Kept a log of which patients were provided with FOBT 19 (46.3%) 18 (43.9%) 0.74
Followed-up on FOBT not completed 9 (22.0%) 13 (31.7%) 0.10
Followed-up on abnormal FOBT 2 (4.9%) 7 (17.1%) 0.06

Total N = 41 who responded to both surveys. P-values based on McNemar’s chi-square tests.