Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 18;27(10):2991–2997. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des263

Table III.

Association between leiomyoma presence, type, location, segment, numbers, volume and time to pregnancy.

Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)a
Leiomyoma present
 No 1.0 1.0
 Yes 0.9 (0.8, 1.0) 1.0 (0.8–1.1)
Leiomyoma type
 No leiomyomata 1.0 1.0
 Any subserous 0.8 (0.7–1.0) 0.9 (0.7–1.1)
 Any submucous 1.0 (0.7–1.4) 1.1 (0.8–1.4)
 Any intramural 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
 Any pedunculated 0.7 (0.4–1.2) 0.8 (0.4–1.3)
Leiomyoma location
 No leiomyomata 1.0 1.0
 Any anterior 0.9 (0.7–1.0) 0.9 (0.8–1.1)
 Any posterior 0.9 (0.8–1.1) 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
 Any both (ant. + post.) 0.6 (0.4–1.1) 0.7 (0.4–1.2)
Leiomyoma segment
 No leiomyomata 1.0 1.0
 Any cervix 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 0.8 (0.6–1.2)
 Any corpus 1.0 (0.8–1.2) 1.0 (0.9–1.3)
 Any fundus 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
Leiomyoma number
 0 1.0 1.0
 1 0.9 (0.8–1.1) 1.0 (0.8–1.1)
 ≥2 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 1.0 (0.7–1.3)
Total leiomyoma volume (cc)
 No leiomyomata 1.0 1.0
 First quartile [0.03, 0.92] 1.0 (0.8–1.3) 1.1 (0.8–1.4)
 Second quartile [0.92, 4.72] 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 0.9 (0.7–1.2)
 Third quartile [4.72, 18.23] 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 0.9 (0.7–1.2)
 Fourth quartile [18.23, 987.2] 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 0.9 (0.7–1.3)
Mean leiomyoma diameter (mm)
 No leiomyomata 1.0 1.0
 First quartile [3.65, 11.25] 1.0 (0.8–1.4) 1.1 (0.9–1.5)
 Second quartile [11.25, 19.50] 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 0.9 (0.7–1.2)
 Third quartile [19.50, 29.33] 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 0.9 (0.7–1.2)
 Fourth quartile [29.33, 123.70] 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 0.9 (0.7–1.2)

OR, odds ratio.

aAll models are adjusted for maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, employment, smoking and body mass index.