Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2012 Oct;67(3):389–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.06.002

Table 5.

Fit statistics for SDT and the 2HTM fit to individual and group data from Starns, Ratcliff, and McKoon (2012).

G2 AIC BIC
SDT 2HTM SDT 2HTM SDT 2HTM
Participant 1 55.12 80.28 528.12 545.28 759.91 746.16
Participant 2 61.23 115.4 540.32 586.5 772.08 787.35
Participant 3 60.23 68.32 523.59 523.67 755.5 724.66
Participant 4 49.94 81.6 525.17 548.82 756.82 749.59
Average 47.51 113.3 636.05 693.89 909.41 930.75
*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

***

p<.001. Bold values denote the better fitting model. Degrees of freedom are 130 for SDT, and 134 for the 2HTM.