Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Transplant. 2012 Sep;22(3):280–293. doi: 10.7182/pit2012890

Table 3.

Ratings of acceptability and satisfaction with the intervention.

Client Satisfaction Questionnaire items M (SD)

Program quality (1=poor, 4=excellent) 3.5 (0.5)
Kind of program others would want (1=no, definitely not, 4=yes, definitely) 3.6 (0.5)
Program met needs (1=none of needs were met; 4 = almost all needs were met) 3.2 (0.8)
Recommend program to others (1=no, definitely not, 4=yes, definitely) 3.6 (0.5)
Satisfied with help received from program (1=quite dissatisfied, 4=very satisfied) 3.3 (0.8)
Program helped me deal with my concerns (1=no, seemed to make things worse; 4=yes, helped a great deal) 3.3 (0.5)
Overall satisfaction with program (1=quite dissatisfied, 4=very satisfied) 3.5 (0.8)
If had it to do again, would participate in program (1=no, definitely not, 4 = yes, definitely) 3.8 (0.5)