Table 5. Group differences in loneliness and connectedness subscales (Beijing older adults).
UCLA Loneliness | Intimate Connectedness | Relational Connectedness | Collective Connectedness | |
Gender | ||||
Male | 36.6 (10.6)* | 12.3 (2.9) | 13.3 (2.4) | 13.4 (2.1) |
Female | 33.9 (9.6) | 12.9 (2.8) | 13.4 (2.4) | 13.8 (1.9) |
Marital status | ||||
Married | 34.3 (9.9)** | 12.8 (2.7)** | 13.5 (2.3)* | 13.7 (2.0)* |
Unmarried | 40.5 (10.0) | 11.2 (2.9) | 12.4 (2.8) | 12.8 (2.1) |
Have children | ||||
Yes | 35.0 10.0) | 12.6 (2.8) | 13.4 (2.4) | 13.6 (2.0) |
No | 38.2 (12.5) | 12.1 (3.2) | 13.2 (2.0) | 13.0 (2.4) |
Have only one child | ||||
Yes | 35.7 (10.1)* | 12.5 (2.8) | 13.1 (2.5)** | 13.6 (2.0) |
No | 32.4 (9.1) | 12.9 (2.6) | 14.4 (2.0) | 13.9 (1.8) |
Single parent | ||||
Yes | 39.6 (9.3)* | 11.3 (2.5)* | 12.4 (2.9)* | 13.0 (2.1) |
No | 34.5 (10.0) | 12.8 (2.8) | 13.5 (2.4) | 13.7 (1.9) |
Religious affiliation | ||||
Yes | 40.4 (9.6) | 11.7 (2.5) | 12.3 (2.3) | 12.7 (2.7) |
No | 35.0 (10.1) | 12.6 (2.8) | 13.4 (2.4) | 13.6 (1.9) |
significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).