Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 11;7(9):e44065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044065

Table 5. Group differences in loneliness and connectedness subscales (Beijing older adults).

UCLA Loneliness Intimate Connectedness Relational Connectedness Collective Connectedness
Gender
Male 36.6 (10.6)* 12.3 (2.9) 13.3 (2.4) 13.4 (2.1)
Female 33.9 (9.6) 12.9 (2.8) 13.4 (2.4) 13.8 (1.9)
Marital status
Married 34.3 (9.9)** 12.8 (2.7)** 13.5 (2.3)* 13.7 (2.0)*
Unmarried 40.5 (10.0) 11.2 (2.9) 12.4 (2.8) 12.8 (2.1)
Have children
Yes 35.0 10.0) 12.6 (2.8) 13.4 (2.4) 13.6 (2.0)
No 38.2 (12.5) 12.1 (3.2) 13.2 (2.0) 13.0 (2.4)
Have only one child
Yes 35.7 (10.1)* 12.5 (2.8) 13.1 (2.5)** 13.6 (2.0)
No 32.4 (9.1) 12.9 (2.6) 14.4 (2.0) 13.9 (1.8)
Single parent
Yes 39.6 (9.3)* 11.3 (2.5)* 12.4 (2.9)* 13.0 (2.1)
No 34.5 (10.0) 12.8 (2.8) 13.5 (2.4) 13.7 (1.9)
Religious affiliation
Yes 40.4 (9.6) 11.7 (2.5) 12.3 (2.3) 12.7 (2.7)
No 35.0 (10.1) 12.6 (2.8) 13.4 (2.4) 13.6 (1.9)
*

significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**

significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).