Skip to main content
editorial
. 2012 Jul 27;7:71. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-71

Table 1.

Summary of issues that influence the likelihood rejection without review of articles submitted to Implementation Science

Issue Likely to be accepted Likely to be rejected
Field of interest
Healthcare and public health
Anything else
Effectiveness studies
Evaluating the introduction of an intervention/evidence-based practice of known effectiveness
Evaluating the effectiveness of a clinical, organizational, public health, or policy intervention
Outcome
Health or health-related
Anything else
Implementation
Researching implementation
Doing implementation
Validity
Maximizes internal and external validity as appropriate in the chosen study designs
 
Patient decision aids
Evaluations of the introduction of patient decision aids (of known effectiveness) into healthcare care settings; involvement of healthcare providers
Initial development or pilot testing of patient decision aids
Implementation (Knowledge Translation) direct to patients
Outcomes referring to evidence-based practice with some involvement of healthcare providers
Other types of outcomes
Intervention development reports
Prepared and submitted prior to the reporting of the effectiveness of the intervention
Post hoc submission
 
Going to be, (robustly) evaluated
Not going to be (robustly) evaluated
Process evaluation
Submitted contemporaneously with or following report of intervention effectiveness
Process evaluations submitted in advance of the conduct of the main effectiveness analysis (it cannot be clear if they are explaining an effect or the absence of an effect)
 
Process evaluations that take account of the main evaluation outcomes
Process evaluations that do not take account of the main evaluation outcomes
Pilot studies
If appropriate criteria for conduct
No justification for conduct
 
If appropriate degree of inference
Overclaim on basis of results
 
If there are plans for further evaluation
 
Protocols
Been through (inter)national level peer review as part of their funding
Not been through national level peer review as part of their funding
 
Received ethics review board approval
Not received ethics review board approval
  Submitted prior to data cleaning or analysis Have begun data cleaning or analysis (may not apply to some qualitative studies)