Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2012 May 26;79:7–15. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.002

Table 1.

Effects of experimental studies of sleep manipulation on glucose tolerance and appetite regulation.

Sleep Manipulation n; age; BMI Outcome Effect Reference
6d 4h TIB v 6d 12 h TIB n=11 men
Age: 18–27 y
BMI <27kg/m2
↓ Glucose Tolerance (−40%)
↓ Acute Insulin Response to Glucose (−30%)
(Spiegel et al., 1999)
6d 4h TIB v 6d 12h TIB n=11 men
Age: 18–26 y
BMI <27kg/m2
↓ Leptin (−19%) (Spiegel et al., 2004a)
2d 4h TIB v 2d 10h TIB n=12 men
Mean ± SD age: 22 ± 2 y
Mean ± SD BMI: 23.6 ± 2.0 kg/m2
↓ Leptin (−18%)
↑ Ghrelin (+28%)
(Spiegel et al., 2004b)
7d 5h TIB v 8d 10h TIB n=20 men
Age: 20–35 y
BMI 20–30 kg/m2
↓ Glucose Tolerance (−14%)
↓ Insulin Sensitivity (−20%)
(Buxton et al., 2010)
3d SWS suppression v 1 baseline night n=5 men; 4 women
Age: 20–31 y
BMI<25 kg/m2
↓ Glucose Tolerance (−23%)
↓ Insulin Sensitivity (−25%)
(Tasali et al., 2008)
2d sleep fragmentation v 1 baseline night n=9 men, 2 women
Age: 18–29 y
Mean ± SD BMI: 24.3±3.0 kg/m2
↓ Insulin Sensitivity (−25%) (Stamatakis & Punjabi, 2010)
5d 4h TIB v 5d 9h TIB n=15 men, 15 women
Age: 30–49 y
BMI 22–26 kg/m2
↑ Caloric Intake (+12%)
↑ Fat Intake (+25%)
(St-Onge et al., 2011)
14d 5.5h TIB v 14d 8.5h TIB n=6 men, 5 women
Age: 34–49 y
BMI: 24–29 kg/m2
↑ caloric intake from snacks (+26%)
No difference in total caloric intake
(Nedeltcheva et al., 2009).
2d 4.25h TIB v 2d 7.25h TIB n=15 men
Age: 20–40 y
BMI<25 kg/m2
No effect on leptin
No effect on ghrelin
No effect on food intake
(Schmid et al., 2009)

Abbreviations: y: years; d: days; h: hours; TIB: time in bed; SWS: slow wave sleep;

Symbols: ↑: increased; ↓: decreased