Table IV.
Behavioral Inhbition Latent Factor | Proportion of Method Variance Explained | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Method | A | C | E | Latent | Au | Cu | Eu | |
14 months | Observation | 0.66** | 0.25 | 0.09** | 0.62 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.38** |
Parent report | 0.29 | 0.31** | 0.30 | 0.11* | ||||
20 months | Observation | 0.43** | 0.46 | 0.11 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.30** |
Parent report | 0.37 | 0.25** | 0.33 | 0.04* | ||||
24 months | Observation | 0.75** | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.26** |
Parent report | 0.38 | 0.31** | 0.13 | 0.17** | ||||
36 months - female | Observation | 0.53** | 0.43 | 0.04 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.26** |
Parent report | 0.36 | 0.13 | 0.46 | 0.05* | ||||
36 months - male | Observation | 0.81* | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.56 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.40** |
Parent report | 0.30 | 0.52** | 0.00 | 0.18** |
Note:
indicates a significant p value of <.05;
indicates a significant p value of <.01. The subscript u refers to unique A, C, and E influences on each method’s variance after accounting for proportion of variance explained by the latent factor.
Parameter estimates were individually dropped from the full model to test statistical significance. A series of one degree of freedom chi-square difference tests were computed comparing the full model to each model with the dropped parameter. Statistical significance is indicated when dropping the parameter from the model results in a significant decrement in fit. Statistical significance of the variance explained by the latent variable was not assessed because the factor loadings are fixed in the psychometric model.