Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Genet. 2012 Jul 18;42(5):764–777. doi: 10.1007/s10519-012-9551-0

Table IV.

Standardized parameter estimates from the psychometric model

Behavioral Inhbition Latent Factor Proportion of Method Variance Explained
Method A C E Latent Au Cu Eu
14 months Observation 0.66** 0.25 0.09** 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.38**
Parent report 0.29 0.31** 0.30 0.11*
20 months Observation 0.43** 0.46 0.11 0.66 0.00 0.04 0.30**
Parent report 0.37 0.25** 0.33 0.04*
24 months Observation 0.75** 0.20 0.05 0.63 0.00 0.10 0.26**
Parent report 0.38 0.31** 0.13 0.17**
36 months - female Observation 0.53** 0.43 0.04 0.65 0.00 0.10 0.26**
Parent report 0.36 0.13 0.46 0.05*
36 months - male Observation 0.81* 0.00 0.19 0.56 0.04 0.00 0.40**
Parent report 0.30 0.52** 0.00 0.18**

Note:

*

indicates a significant p value of <.05;

**

indicates a significant p value of <.01. The subscript u refers to unique A, C, and E influences on each method’s variance after accounting for proportion of variance explained by the latent factor.

Parameter estimates were individually dropped from the full model to test statistical significance. A series of one degree of freedom chi-square difference tests were computed comparing the full model to each model with the dropped parameter. Statistical significance is indicated when dropping the parameter from the model results in a significant decrement in fit. Statistical significance of the variance explained by the latent variable was not assessed because the factor loadings are fixed in the psychometric model.