Table VI.
Model | −2ll | df | AIC | TLI | RMSEA | Δ | Δ−2ll | Δdf | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14 months | 1) Saturated | 3449.02 | 1576 | 297.02 | ||||||
2) Biometric | 3493.27 | 1620 | 253.27 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 2 vs. 1 | 44.25 | 44 | 0.46 | |
3) Psychometric | 3497.48 | 1620 | 257.48 | 0.99 | 0.02 | 3 vs. 1 | 48.45 | 44 | 0.30 | |
4) Rater Bias | 3493.42 | 1621 | 251.42 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 4 vs. 1 | 44.39 | 45 | 0.50 | |
4 vs. 2 | 0.14 | 1 | 0.70 | |||||||
20 months | 5) Saturated | 3341.16 | 1576 | 189.16 | ||||||
6) Biometric | 3396.38 | 1620 | 156.38 | 0.99 | 0.04 | 6 vs. 5 | 55.22 | 44 | 0.12 | |
7) Psychometric | 3396.40 | 1620 | 156.40 | 0.99 | 0.04 | 7 vs. 5 | 55.23 | 44 | 0.12 | |
8) Rater Bias | 3399.67 | 1621 | 157.67 | 0.98 | 0.04 | 8 vs. 5 | 58.51 | 45 | 0.09 | |
8 vs. 6 | 3.29 | 1 | 0.07 | |||||||
24 months | 9) Saturated | 3366.66 | 1576 | 214.66 | ||||||
10) Biometric | 3410.34 | 1620 | 170.34 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 10 vs. 9 | 43.68 | 44 | 0.49 | |
11) Psychometric | 3410.34 | 1620 | 170.34 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 11 vs. 9 | 43.68 | 44 | 0.49 | |
12) Rater Bias | 3415.33 | 1621 | 173.33 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 12 vs. 9 | 48.67 | 45 | 0.33 | |
12 vs. 10 | 4.99 | 1 | 0.03 | |||||||
36 months | 13) Saturated | 3287.62 | 1576 | 135.62 | ||||||
14) Biometric | 3327.00 | 1608 | 111.00 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 14 vs. 13 | 39.38 | 32 | 0.17 | |
15) Psychometric | 3327.60 | 1608 | 111.60 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 15 vs. 13 | 39.98 | 32 | 0.16 | |
16) Rater Bias | 3331.05 | 1610 | 111.05 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 16 vs. 13 | 43.43 | 34 | 0.13 | |
16 vs. 14 | 4.06 | 2 | 0.13 |
Note: −2ll = negative two log-likelihood. df = degrees of freedom. AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion. TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index. RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation.