Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2012 Oct;44(2):207–215. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9378-1

Table 2.

Effects of Multisystemic Therapy versus Telephone Support on Metabolic Control and Regimen Adherence

Time and regression model HbA1c DMS-Parent DMS-Youth
7 Months post-test
Model 1
 Baseline status, β1 (95% CI) 0.61 (0.49, 0.74) * 0.53 (0.41, 0.66) * 0.49 (0.36, 0.63)
 Intervention condition, β2 (95% CI) −0.98 (−1.63, −0.34) * 5.70 (1.58, 9.82) * 1.61 (−2.64, 5.86)
 Model fit: R2 0.43 0.37 0.27
Model 2
 Baseline measure, β1 (95% CI) 0.58 (0.44,0.73) * 0.47 (0.34, 0.60) * 0.44 (0.30, 0.58)
 Intervention condition, β2 (95% CI) −1.01 (−1.67, −0.36) * 5.72 (1.61, 9.83) * 1.54 (−2.67, 5.74)
 Age (in years), β3 (95% CI) 0.05 (−0.10, 0.21) −0.93 (−1.92, 0.05) −0.97 (−1.94, 0.01)
 Race, β4 (95% CI) 0.39 (−0.45, 1.24) 1.15 (−3.94, 6.23) 1.92 (−3.22, 7.06)
 Single parent, β4(95% CI) −0.01 (−0.70, 0.67) 2.21 (−2.12, 6.54) 0.68 (−3.82, 5.17)
 Type 1 vs. type 2, β5 (95% CI) −0.32 (−1.41, 0.76) −2.70 (−9.50, 4.10) −5.86 (−12.81, 1.08)
 Model fit: R2 0.44 0.40 0.32
12 Months post-test
Model 1
 Baseline measure, β1 (95% CI) 0.68 (0.54, 0.83) * 0.55 (0.43, 0.67) * 0.66 (0.51, 0.80)
 Intervention condition, β2 (95% CI) −0.67(−1.40, 0.07) 4.77 (0.88, 8.67) * 1.37 (−3.08, 5.83)
 Model fit: R2 0.41 0.41 0.37
Model 2
 Baseline measure, β1 (95% CI) 0.63 (0.47, 0.78)* 0.50 (0.38, 0.63)* 0.59 (0.43, 0.74)
 Intervention condition, β2 (95% CI) −0.74 (−1.48, −0.01)* 5.10 (1.21, 8.99)* 1.51 (−2.86, 5.88)
 Age (in years), β3 (95% CI) 0.07 (−0.11, 0.24) −0.84 (−1.74, 0.07) −1.36 (−2.35, −0.38)
 Race, β4 (95% CI) 0.39 (−0.59, 1.36) −0.80 (−5.72, 4.12) −0.91 (−6.48, 4.66)
 Single parent, β4(95% CI) 0.06 (−0.71, 0.83) −1.53 (−5.60, 2.53) 1.39 (−3.25, 6.03)
 Type 1 vs. type 2, β5 (95% CI) 1.14 (−0.11, 2.39) −4.55(−11.11, 2.02) −4.43 (−11.80, 2.95)
 Model fit: R2 0.43 0.44 0.42

Note. DMS= Diabetes Management Scale.

*

p < .05.