Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 6;16(5):1499–1506. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0645-5

Table 1.

Surface roughness, dehydrated thickness, coefficient of friction, and adhesion energy for glass and SCFs after different modes of brushing

Surface roughness (nm) Dehydrated thickness (nm) Coefficient of friction Adhesion energy (10−18 J)
Glass 0.13 ± 0.01 0.0 ± 0.0 0.450 ± 0.040 −86 ± 14
Unbrushed 16-h SCF 0.41 ± 0.02 4.9 ± 0.3 0.037 ± 0.000 −14 ± 2
Manual Rotary–oscillatory 0.55 ± 0.08 4.1 ± 0.4 0.030 ± 0.000 −9 ± 3
OFF
Sonic 0.86 ± 0.12 4.2 ± 0.6 0.040 ± 0.000 −6 ± 1
OFF
Powered Rotary–oscillatory 5.37 ± 1.22 3.3 ± 0.4 0.630 ± 0.090 −51 ± 30
ON
Sonic 1.96 ± 0.55 3.6 ± 0.6 0.110 ± 0.010 −24 ± 8
ON

Brushing was done manually (OFF) and powered (ON) with a rotary-oscillating and sonic toothbrush

± standard error over nine AFM and two XPS measurements