Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 14;53(10):6153–6163. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8375

Table 4.  .

Intersubject and Intersession Variability from a Two-Way ANOVA of Brain Activation Patterns for Four Paradigms


Paradigm

Lobe

Control Group

Patient Group

Within-Subject

Between-Subject

Within-Subject

Between-Subject

F Value

P Value

F Value

P Value

F Value

P Value

F Value

P Value
Dot saccade paradigm Frontal 1.36 0.29 28.42 <0.01** 0.80 0.51 3.10 0.22
Parietal 0.95 0.41 34.54 <0.01** 0.05 0.95 15.17 0.06
Temporal 1.48 0.26 10.49 <0.05* 0.12 0.89 19.64 <0.05*
Occipital 0.09 0.91 214.16 <0.01** 0.39 0.70 11.53 0.08
Letter saccade paradigm Frontal 1.77 0.21 106.95 <0.01** 2.44 0.17 15.91 <0.05*
Parietal 1.77 0.21 18.47 <0.01** 1.01 0.42 35.70 <0.01**
Temporal 1.67 0.22 24.79 <0.01** 0.61 0.58 62.02 <0.01**
Occipital 0.95 0.41 193.15 <0.01** 12.05 <0.01** 48.87 <0.01**
3-Letter word paradigm Frontal 1.08 0.36 60.79 <0.01** 0.50 0.63 37.85 <0.01**
Parietal 1.39 0.28 51.26 <0.01** 1.30 0.34 14.96 <0.05*
Temporal 0.06 0.94 41.65 <0.01** 0.47 0.64 27.99 <0.05*
Occipital 0.87 0.44 42.90 <0.01** 1.13 0.38 14.03 <0.05*
6-Letter word paradigm Frontal 0.84 0.45 37.78 <0.01** 0.09 0.92 348.36 <0.01**
Parietal 0.80 0.47 23.89 <0.01** 0.44 0.67 6.60 0.12
Temporal 3.65 0.053 24.23 <0.01** 0.95 0.46 4.69 0.16
Occipital 0.11 0.90 100.23 <0.01** 1.04 0.43 18.38 <0.05*

Session and subject are treated as two random factors. Significant correlations are indicated by asterisks.

* P < 0.05.

** P < 0.01.