. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Matern Child Health J. 2012 Apr;16(Suppl 1):S178–S187. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1008-9

Table 3.

Selected states’ prevalence of components of family-centered care for children with public and private insurance, 2007

	Did the provider spend enough time?^a		Did the provider listen carefully?^a		Was the provider sensitive to family values and customs?^a		Did the provider provide needed information?^a		Did the provider make the family feel like partners in care?^a
	Public	Private	Public	Private	Public	Private	Public	Private	Public	Private
States with highest medical home prevalence for publicly-insured children
VT	86^b	91	93	96	94	96	88^b	93	93	94
WV	86	86	93	94	90^b	95	88	90	93	93
ND	85	88	87	92	87^b	95	87	87	90	92
NH	87	92	92	95	92	95	86	90	91	93
NE	78^b	89	94	95	93	96	87^b	93	93	94
States with lowest medical home prevalence for publicly-insured children
NM	65^b	83	78^b	91	78^b	92	76^b	88	81^b	89
DC	63^b	86	84^b	92	80^b	90	78^b	87	85	88
NV	62^b	79	81	87	75^b	88	75^b	83	77	84
CA	65^b	83	78^b	91	76^b	93	77	84	78^b	89
TX	61^b	84	84^b	91	83^b	92	76^b	87	84	88

Percent responding always/usually versus sometimes/never

Difference between public and private significant at p < 0.05