Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 Jul 24;27(9):879–886. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.07.002

Table 2.

Root mean square (RMS) differences between the simulated joint kinematics and handrim forces and corresponding mean experimental value for each biofeedback condition. For comparison, one standard deviation (SD) of the experimental data is provided (in parentheses) to indicate inter-subject variability.

Tracking Differences (Simulation vs. Experimental) Biofeedback Condition
Self-Selected Max Contact Angle Min Peak Force Min Cadence

Joint Kinematics (degrees) Elevation Plane 1.7 (14.7) 4.8 (20.5) 2.5 (17.0) 4.3 (18.7)
Elevation Angle 0.3 (5.8) 3.3 (7.7) 0.4 (6.3) 2.7 (7.7)
Shoulder Rotation 5.5 (15.5) 9.1 (24.3) 2.4 (14.3) 4.5 (18.9)
Elbow Flexion-Extension 1.0 (13.0) 5.4 (13.4) 0.9 (10.8) 4.3 (13.9)
Pronation-Supination 1.4 (12.4) 2.5 (13.7) 1.0 (12.4) 2.8 (10.6)

All Joints 2.0 (12.3) 5.0 (15.9) 1.5 (12.2) 3.7 (14.0)

Handrim Forces (N) Tangential 2.57 (7.67) 11.97 (17.15) 6.49 (6.11) 18.98 (20.78)
Radial 3.80 (9.40) 4.42 (15.51) 3.44 (7.70) 30.00 (27.71)
Lateral 1.16 (7.77) 4.76 (12.47) 1.36 (5.66) 9.35 (17.93)

All Forces 2.51 (8.28) 7.05 (15.04) 3.78 (6.50) 19.45 (22.14)