Skip to main content
. 2004 Feb;42(2):759–763. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.759-763.2004

TABLE 1.

Detection of equine influenza virus by virus isolation, antigen detection, and RT-PCR in foals infected experimentally with A/Equi/2/Kildare/89a

Horse and day postchallenge VI EID50/ml TCID50/ml DFAb PCR O PCR I PCR M
Horse 1
    1
    2 + 101.5 101.25 + +
    3 + 101.5 100.75 + +
    4 + 101.1 101.75 + +
    5 + 101.2 102.5 + +
    6 + +
    7 +
    8
    9
    10
Horse 2
    1
    2 + 101 +
    3 + 101.8 103 + + + NAc
    4 + 101.7 102.25 ++ + +
    5 + 101.8 103.25 +++ + + +
    6 + 102.2 102.25 +++ + +
    7 + 100.8 +
    8
    9
    10
Horse 3
    1
    2 + 101.2 101.5 + + +
    3 + 101.3 102.75 ++ + +
    4 + 102 102.25 + +
    5 + 102.2 104 + + +
    6 + 101.8 102.25 ++ + + +
    7 + 101.2 101.75 + +
    8
    9
    10
Horse 4
    1 +
    2 + +
    3 + 100.6 +
    4 + 101 101.5 + + +
    5 + 102.3 102.25 + + +
    6 + 102.8 102 + +
    7
    8
    9
    10
a

VI, virus isolation (in embryonated eggs) from the nasal secretions prior to freezing; PCR O, PCR using the NPF and NPR primers; PCR 1, nested PCR using NPF, NPR, NPFI, and NPRI; PCR M, PCR using M52C and M253R. All aliquots assayed by EID50, TCID50, DFA, and PCR had undergone a single freeze-thaw cycle.

b

For DFA scores, see Materials and Methods.

c

NA, not applicable.